Abstract:ental health disorders are the largest contributors to the non-fatal burden of disease in Australia 1 and are a leading cause of morbidity. Rates of mental health disorders are higher among people with intellectual disability than for the general population. [2][3][4][5] Nevertheless, the drivers of mental health service use by people with intellectual disability are unknown. Better understanding of their health needs is critical for responding to the recent finding by the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse… Show more
“…People with intellectual disability have high health needs that require frequent use of acute health care services such as emergency departments and hospitalisations [ 1 , 2 ]. People with intellectual disability often experience poor quality of care and inefficiency of care in these settings [ 3 , 4 ], which contribute to reattendance at emergency departments, and readmission within close proximity to discharge [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Adults with intellectual disability have high health care needs. Despite frequent contact with health services, they often receive inadequate health care. One method to improve health care delivery is reasonable adjustments, that is, the adaptation of health care delivery such that barriers to participation are removed for the person with disability. A starting point for the provision of reasonable adjustments is recognition of intellectual disability during the health care contact. To determine rates and predictors of the recognition of intellectual disability during hospital admissions, and its impact on admission metrics, we examined a population of adults with intellectual disability identified from disability services datasets from New South Wales, Australia between 2005 and 2014. Recognition of intellectual disability was determined by the recording of an International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnostic code for intellectual disability during a given hospital admission. We examined how recognition of intellectual disability related to length of hospital episodes. We found an overall low rate of recognition of intellectual disability (23.79%) across all hospital episodes, with the proportion of hospital episodes recognising intellectual disability decreasing from 2005–2015. Admissions for adults with complex health profiles (e.g., those with many comorbidities, those with Autism Spectrum Disorder, and those admitted for urgent treatment) were more likely to recognise intellectual disability, but admissions for adults with complexity in other domains (i.e., for those in custody, or those with drug and alcohol disorders) were less likely to recognise intellectual disability. Recognition of intellectual disability was associated with longer episodes of care, possibly indicating the greater provision of reasonable adjustments. To improve the recognition of intellectual disability for adults during health service contacts, we advocate for the implementation of targeted initiatives (such as a nationwide disability flag to be included in health service records) to improve the provision of reasonable adjustments.
“…People with intellectual disability have high health needs that require frequent use of acute health care services such as emergency departments and hospitalisations [ 1 , 2 ]. People with intellectual disability often experience poor quality of care and inefficiency of care in these settings [ 3 , 4 ], which contribute to reattendance at emergency departments, and readmission within close proximity to discharge [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Adults with intellectual disability have high health care needs. Despite frequent contact with health services, they often receive inadequate health care. One method to improve health care delivery is reasonable adjustments, that is, the adaptation of health care delivery such that barriers to participation are removed for the person with disability. A starting point for the provision of reasonable adjustments is recognition of intellectual disability during the health care contact. To determine rates and predictors of the recognition of intellectual disability during hospital admissions, and its impact on admission metrics, we examined a population of adults with intellectual disability identified from disability services datasets from New South Wales, Australia between 2005 and 2014. Recognition of intellectual disability was determined by the recording of an International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnostic code for intellectual disability during a given hospital admission. We examined how recognition of intellectual disability related to length of hospital episodes. We found an overall low rate of recognition of intellectual disability (23.79%) across all hospital episodes, with the proportion of hospital episodes recognising intellectual disability decreasing from 2005–2015. Admissions for adults with complex health profiles (e.g., those with many comorbidities, those with Autism Spectrum Disorder, and those admitted for urgent treatment) were more likely to recognise intellectual disability, but admissions for adults with complexity in other domains (i.e., for those in custody, or those with drug and alcohol disorders) were less likely to recognise intellectual disability. Recognition of intellectual disability was associated with longer episodes of care, possibly indicating the greater provision of reasonable adjustments. To improve the recognition of intellectual disability for adults during health service contacts, we advocate for the implementation of targeted initiatives (such as a nationwide disability flag to be included in health service records) to improve the provision of reasonable adjustments.
“…Respondents in both age-groups reported higher level of anxiety than the general Australian population, and prevalence of depression was higher than the general population in the older-aged group (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018b). Previous studies have found that up to a third of people with intellectual disability have a co-existing psychiatric illness (Mazza et al, 2020;Morgan et al, 2008), and are higher users of mental health services (Srasuebkul et al, 2021). Conditions that have previously been shown to be associated with intellectual disability at higher rates than the general population include schizophrenia and unspecified psychiatric disorders (Mazza et al, 2020).…”
BackgroundNon‐communicable diseases (NCDs), also known as chronic diseases, now constitute a major proportion of ill‐health across most adult and older populations including in people with intellectual disability. The current paper is a comparative analysis of prevalence of NCDs across mid‐aged and older‐aged people with mild intellectual disability.MethodComparative data comes from two cross‐sectional surveys using similar methodology and timeframes. The analysis sample comprises mid‐aged group (30–50 years, N = 291) and older‐aged group (≥60 years, N = 391).ResultsPeople with mild intellectual disability start developing NCDs in early to mid‐adulthood and increases with age. The mean number of NCDs in mid‐aged group was 0.86 (SD, 0.84) compared to 3.82 in older group (SD, 2.67).ConclusionThere needs to be early identification and management of NCDs using relevant health promotion and preventative measures at optimal intervention points. The training of healthcare professionals needs improvement.
“…The intellectual disability health sector in Australia has strong roots in primary care, where a lot of early research and pivotal work around the utility of health assessments was undertaken (e.g., Lennox et al, 2010). More recent research has focused on understanding knowledge and skill gaps in our health workforce (e.g., Cashin et al, 2022) and describing how people with intellectual disability use our health system to inform service planning (e.g., Srasuebkul et al, 2021). Groundwork, including Medicare reimbursement and collation of evidence of effectiveness, has been laid to support routine application of comprehensive annual health assessments by GPs.…”
Section: An Emerging Evidence Base For Healthcare For People With Int...mentioning
People with intellectual disability experience some of the greatest health disparities in Australia. Individuals are expected to access mainstream health services that are ill equipped to meet their needs. The Australian government has made recent commitments to improve the healthcare of people with intellectual disability. This article describes the Australian health system and how it responds to the needs of people with intellectual disability. It draws on examples of advances in policy, inclusion, and service development, achieved through concrete and persistent systemic advocacy, to discuss emerging evidence on the delivery of healthcare to people with intellectual disability in Australia. The article also highlights immediate priorities including increasing the uptake of health assessments, building the capacity of our health workforce, and responding to the needs of people with intellectual disability in COVID‐19 outbreaks or other natural disasters. Intellectual disability healthcare is at a dynamic point in Australia with commitment and funding from government to lead to change. It is critical that momentum in health services development is maintained to enable improved health outcomes for people with intellectual disability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.