Public knowledge and stigma of autism spectrum disorder: Comparing China with the United States

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder in China differs considerably from autism spectrum disorder in the West in terms of prevalence estimates, education opportunities, and life outcomes of autistic people. The lack of autism spectrum disorder awareness could be a key factor underlying the disparities. To date, there has been no evaluation of autism spectrum disorder knowledge among the general public of China. Using the Autism Stigma and Knowledge Questionnaire developed for use in diverse cultural contexts, this study uncovered profoundly different public views about autism spectrum disorder in China compared with the United States. Determined by cognitive diagnosis modeling, 86%–91% of the surveyed U.S. citizens ( N = 1127) achieved adequate autism spectrum disorder knowledge in diagnosis/symptoms, etiology, and treatment, whereas for the Chinese citizens ( N = 1254) the percentages were only 57%–65%. Moreover, 14% of the participants from the United States were classified to endorse autism spectrum disorder stigma; in comparison, 38% of the Chinese participants endorsed autism spectrum disorder stigma. The Chinese citizens displayed knowledge deficits primarily in the areas of autism spectrum disorder core symptoms, comorbid intellectual impairment, and prognosis. Sociodemographic factors associated with the Chinese citizen’s misconceptions included gender, ethnicity, social economic factors, among others. These results have important implications for increasing public awareness and promoting community participation for autistic individuals in China. Lay abstract ASD in China differs considerably from ASD in the West in terms of prevalence estimates, education opportunities and life outcomes of autistic people. The lack of ASD awareness could be a key factor underlying these disparities. We asked 1127 U.S. citizens and 1254 Chinese citizens about their autism knowledge using the Autism Stigma and Knowledge Questionnaire (ASK-Q).The results indicated profoundly different public views about ASD in China compared to the U.S. Specifically, only 57%-65% of the Chinese citizens demonstrated adequate ASD knowledge compared to 86%-91% in the U.S. citizens. Fourteen percent of the U.S. citizens were shown to hold stigma beliefs towards ASD; in comparison, 38% of the Chinese citizens indicated ASD stigma. The Chinese citizens displayed misconceptions about ASD related to symptoms, causes, and possible long-term outcomes. In China but not in the U.S., male citizens and citizens with lower social economic status were more likely to have misconceptions about ASD than others were. The findings of this research can help increase public awareness about ASD and create a more inclusive environment for autistic people in China.

Urgency in Improving Child Health Care Workers' Awareness and Knowledge of ASD: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study in Southwest China

“…The prevalence estimates of ASD in China differ significantly from those in the West, and the key factor in this difference may be the lack of awareness of ASD in China ( 18 ). Gaps in awareness and knowledge of ASD among child health care workers may lead to delays in diagnosis and intervention.…”

Cross-cultural perspectives on the meaning of family quality of life: Comparing Korean immigrant families and Canadian families of children with autism spectrum disorder

“…Independence and autonomy are less valued in collectivist versus individualist cultures. In addition, other cultural factors, such as stigma, which exists in Western cultures ( Green, 2003 ; Kinnear et al, 2016 ; Yu et al, 2020 ) but has been reported to be particularly salient in a number of Asian cultures due to the association with shame and dishonor ( Hwang & Charnley, 2010 ; Mak & Cheung, 2008 ; Mak & Kwok, 2010 ; Zhou et al, 2018 ), may be a powerful predictor of FQOL. In confronting adversity, the concept of resilience may be valid in both Western and Korean cultures and may be potentially valuable when attempting to assess how the family navigates between personal experience with ASD and cultural beliefs about ASD ( Hwang & Charnley, 2010 ).…”

A qualitative study of autism services and supports in Singapore: Perspectives of service providers, autistic adults and caregivers

“…Crucially, all these efforts should be grounded in a cohesive ideology that does not solely focus on impairment and deficits but recognises the strengths and potential of autistic individuals alongside the very real needs that they may have. While autism stigma is not a problem unique to Singapore (Liao et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2020), our participants' responses suggest that Singapore may be lagging behind in the global movement away from a pure medical model of disability.…”