1992
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/2.1.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Health Medicine Training in the European Community: Is There Scope for Harmonization?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, many new schools have developed in countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, largely based on pre-existing departments of social medicine, occupational and environmental health, epidemiology and others with stimulus of MPHs and PhDs newly trained abroad. [16][17][18][19] While the US or new European models may not be ideal, there is a case to be made to develop a more comprehensive approach in Canada by unifying the multiplicity of academic departments, centres and institutes "under one umbrella", creating recognizable high-profile academic centres of excellence, preferably -but not necessarily -with independent or semi-independent faculty status. Uniting relevant departments and centres into a faculty or school with a defined common mission and objectives would enhance their combined capability to produce the needed cadre and standards of public health professionals.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past decade, many new schools have developed in countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, largely based on pre-existing departments of social medicine, occupational and environmental health, epidemiology and others with stimulus of MPHs and PhDs newly trained abroad. [16][17][18][19] While the US or new European models may not be ideal, there is a case to be made to develop a more comprehensive approach in Canada by unifying the multiplicity of academic departments, centres and institutes "under one umbrella", creating recognizable high-profile academic centres of excellence, preferably -but not necessarily -with independent or semi-independent faculty status. Uniting relevant departments and centres into a faculty or school with a defined common mission and objectives would enhance their combined capability to produce the needed cadre and standards of public health professionals.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But brought together, each would contribute to a larger and potentially more robust entity with the sum being greater than its parts. 18 Schools of public health should attract federal and provincial recognition, support and funding. A Canadawide system of accreditation will be equally important to promote national standards and international recognition.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, such as surgery, this was not an obstacle as it was recognized from the outset in all member states. In contrast, it was problematic for specialities such as public health that was recognized only in the United Kingdom and Ireland, although subsequently also in France and Finland(McKee et al 1992). The original directives were supplemented by a series of subsequent amendments (European Commission 1989a), largely involving extending the number of specialities recognized in each member state and, more recently, to include the newer member states and the wider European Economic Area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%