1999
DOI: 10.1086/250096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Health Insurance and Private Savings

Abstract: 2We assess the effect of a means and asset-tested social insurance program, Medicaid, on the savings behavior of households. We do so using both data on asset holdings and on consumption, matched to information on the eligibility of families for health insurance coverage under this program.Exogenous variation in Medicaid eligibility is provided by the dramatic expansion of this program over the 1984 to 1993 period. We document that Medicaid eligibility has a sizeable and significant negative effect on wealth h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starr-McCluer (1996) finds that households with no health insurance save on average more than people with insurance, other things equal. Gruber and Yelowitz (1999) find that Medicaid eligibility has a significant negative effect on wealth holdings, and positive association with consumption expenditures. They interpret this finding as evidence that Medicaid eligibility lowers the expenditure risk and the need for precautionary saving.…”
Section: Precautionary Saving: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Starr-McCluer (1996) finds that households with no health insurance save on average more than people with insurance, other things equal. Gruber and Yelowitz (1999) find that Medicaid eligibility has a significant negative effect on wealth holdings, and positive association with consumption expenditures. They interpret this finding as evidence that Medicaid eligibility lowers the expenditure risk and the need for precautionary saving.…”
Section: Precautionary Saving: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Government transfer programs, including AFDC/TANF and Medicaid, may affect household wealth by reducing saving incentives and encouraging dissaving due to asset tests, or both, but evidence for these effects is mixed (Gruber & Yelowitz 1999, Hurst & Ziliak 2006, Sullivan 2006). Policies to increase savings incentives, such as matching contributions to savings accounts — which are sometimes contingent on using the savings for qualified expenditures like purchasing a home, starting a business, or financing education — may also spur asset-building among low-income households.…”
Section: Part Iii: Evidence On Wealth Consequences and Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using variation in state Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women and children, Gruber and Yelowitz examined the impact of Medicaid expansions on changes in family saving and spending behavior. 28 The authors found evidence that expanded Medicaid decreased asset holdings and increased non-medical spending among low-income families. Leininger, Levy, and Schanzenbach used a similar approach to analyze later expansions in public insurance for children under CHIP and also found evidence that low-income households increased their expenditures on non-medical goods.…”
Section: Financial Benefits Of Expanded Health Insurance Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%