2020
DOI: 10.4337/9781788971225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Governance Paradigms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
87
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, this paradigm asks the most of public servants as professionals. They need to master a broad set of technical skills and expertise (i.e., their own profession complemented with, among others, relevant management and economic knowledge) to be able to operate effectively in a decentralized setting, and they need to understand and adhere to a wide range of public values to be able to deliver public services in a manner that enhances the capacity of service receivers to become self-authoring (Torfing et al, 2020). In sum, in the balancing act of merging narrow and broad professionalism, New Public Management may tip the balance toward narrow professionalism at the expense of broad professionalism; New Public Governance may tip the balance toward broad professionalism at the expense of narrow professionalism; and Post-Bureaucracy may strike the right balance but at the expense of asking more of public servants than what they can reasonably deliver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, this paradigm asks the most of public servants as professionals. They need to master a broad set of technical skills and expertise (i.e., their own profession complemented with, among others, relevant management and economic knowledge) to be able to operate effectively in a decentralized setting, and they need to understand and adhere to a wide range of public values to be able to deliver public services in a manner that enhances the capacity of service receivers to become self-authoring (Torfing et al, 2020). In sum, in the balancing act of merging narrow and broad professionalism, New Public Management may tip the balance toward narrow professionalism at the expense of broad professionalism; New Public Governance may tip the balance toward broad professionalism at the expense of narrow professionalism; and Post-Bureaucracy may strike the right balance but at the expense of asking more of public servants than what they can reasonably deliver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘new’ public governance refers to a variety of new emphases on: network-centred approaches, as opposed to both NPM market-driven approaches and ‘antiquated’ hierarchy-centred approaches; collaborations, especially between public sector and third-sector organisations and more broadly at the state-society interface, rather than relying only on government-centred service delivery; and, clusters of actors becoming centre stage. This gave rise to a range of ‘governance quasi-paradigms’ (Torfing et al., 2020) – forms of collaborative governance and new models in policy-making and service delivery centred on the co-production of public services, the co-design and co-implementation of public policies and the co-creation of new solutions to public problems (Osborne, 2010; Torfing et al., 2012).…”
Section: What Themes Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-production and co-creation are both gaining ground at the public service production level. However, most public services are still designed and produced by bureaucratic and professionalized public agencies with little contribution from service users, citizens, and volunteers [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%