2019
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2016.0543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Governance, Corporate Governance, and Firm Innovation: An Examination of State-Owned Enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
141
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
141
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, it enriches and expands the mechanism and boundary of the organizational imprinting theory and reveals the dynamic process of the entrepreneur imprinting in the aesthetic plastic surgery industry. Previous studies paid much attention to the survival and development of state-owned enterprises (Jia, Guang-Lih, & Man, 2019) while little attention has been paid to the private aesthetic plastic surgery hospitals in China which can be regarded as a significant reflection of Chinese new economic reform. The emergence and booming of the industry was regarded as a derivative of the rapid development of society and continuous improvement of people's living standards.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it enriches and expands the mechanism and boundary of the organizational imprinting theory and reveals the dynamic process of the entrepreneur imprinting in the aesthetic plastic surgery industry. Previous studies paid much attention to the survival and development of state-owned enterprises (Jia, Guang-Lih, & Man, 2019) while little attention has been paid to the private aesthetic plastic surgery hospitals in China which can be regarded as a significant reflection of Chinese new economic reform. The emergence and booming of the industry was regarded as a derivative of the rapid development of society and continuous improvement of people's living standards.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Girma et al (2009) proved that inward FDI generate higher innovative activity in Chinese state-owned enterprises at the firm level, yet would have a negative impact on innovative activity in SOEs on average at the sector level [22]. Besides, agency risk can be a significant barriers of innovation activities [23]. From another perspective, the development of corporate innovation ability can be hindered by outdated mental models, risk-averse corporate environments, poor innovation management, inadequate follow-up capabilities, and the inability to develop mandatory internal or external infrastructure [24].…”
Section: Innovation Capability Of Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, an exploitative CEO whose interest is benefitting themselves regardless of all the stakeholders they are working with/for is more likely to prioritize their benefit and not that of the organization or those who work in it. Accordingly, an exploitative CEO is more likely to be risk-averse due to the uncertainty and information asymmetry associated with taking risks, resulting in limited investment in firm innovativeness (Jia, Huang, & Zhang, 2019). Furthermore, the employees of the organization will be less motivated/willing to share their ideas and knowledge given the unfair treatment (Franke, Keinz, & Klausberger, 2013).…”
Section: The Dark Side Of Ceo Exploitative Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%