1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.1987.tb00869.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Enterprises in Greece

Abstract: lntroductlonOver the last twenty years, the literature on the comparative performance of public and private enterprises, and on the privatization of public enterprises (PEs) in developed and developing economies has been extensive and growing 1. The related literature on this subject in the case of Greece is very limited. To our knowledge there are only two recent studies on this subject by Provopoulos (1982Provopoulos ( , 1985. The purpose of this paper is to help close this gap by investigating the state, pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the normative framework and the formal policy directions, reform programmes were implemented through small steps that took time to produce outcomes and in many cases faced resistance and had to confront inherent problems of the SOE sector. In practice, most SOEs suffer certain long standing weaknesses that relate to the broader characteristics of the public sector in Greece, such as (over-) politicization, party patronage, lack of management independence, manipulation by the government, corruption, inefficiency and the existence of interest groups extracting rents from the SOEs' activity (Georgakopoulos et al 1987;Lioukas and Papoulias 1990;Haritakis and Pitelis 1998;Tsoukas and Papoulias 2004;Papoulias 2007). These factors coupled with the statism tradition of Greece and the low reform capacity of the Greek public sector (Featherstone 2005;Spanou 2008) have limited the potential of a radical transformation of SOEs over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond the normative framework and the formal policy directions, reform programmes were implemented through small steps that took time to produce outcomes and in many cases faced resistance and had to confront inherent problems of the SOE sector. In practice, most SOEs suffer certain long standing weaknesses that relate to the broader characteristics of the public sector in Greece, such as (over-) politicization, party patronage, lack of management independence, manipulation by the government, corruption, inefficiency and the existence of interest groups extracting rents from the SOEs' activity (Georgakopoulos et al 1987;Lioukas and Papoulias 1990;Haritakis and Pitelis 1998;Tsoukas and Papoulias 2004;Papoulias 2007). These factors coupled with the statism tradition of Greece and the low reform capacity of the Greek public sector (Featherstone 2005;Spanou 2008) have limited the potential of a radical transformation of SOEs over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this notion of social responsibility depends on each company's criteria and is far from a broader context of social policy. In contrast to the nationalization era, where SOEs were used as policy instruments for serving a range of social and economic goals including development, income distribution, poverty and employment (Ministry of Finance 1986;Georgakopoulos et al 1987;Lioukas and Papoulias 1990), the scope of these practices after corporatization, privatization and liberalization has been limited. In the past decade, most of the SOEs under study have developed social responsibility programmes that encompass a variety of initiatives (Table 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third major wave of nationalisations occurred under the first Pan Hellenic Socialistic Movement (Πανελλήνιο Σοσιαλιστικό Κίνημα, PASOK) government of Andreas Papandreou. To a certain extent, this socialist wave of nationalisations ('socialisations') reflected a government strategy of assuming control over 'strategic' sectors of the economy, as with the nationalisations of Larco (mineral exploitation), Pyrkal (munitions industry), the Lavrion lead mines and the Heracles General Cement Company (Georgakopoulos et al 1987;Teitgen-Colly 1987). By 1983, 19 out of the top 50 industrial concerns in Greece were controlled either directly or indirectly by the state -a single-year increase of eight very large firms (Bermeo 1990: 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%