2002
DOI: 10.1080/02680930210158320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public education and democracy: a changing relationship in a globalizing world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is now a need to recommit to values such as reciprocity, altruism, social and economic equality and inclusivity to govern the education system. In suggesting that we need to reclaim public education I would agree with others (Stewart, 2005;Vickers, 2005;Lawton, 2005;Ball, 2003;Reid, 2002;Whitty, 2002) who argue that the role of the state is being dismantled and the public nature of education is diminishing. What then are the factors that have been responsible for this decline?…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is now a need to recommit to values such as reciprocity, altruism, social and economic equality and inclusivity to govern the education system. In suggesting that we need to reclaim public education I would agree with others (Stewart, 2005;Vickers, 2005;Lawton, 2005;Ball, 2003;Reid, 2002;Whitty, 2002) who argue that the role of the state is being dismantled and the public nature of education is diminishing. What then are the factors that have been responsible for this decline?…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Financial responsibility and accountability are devolved to individual schools and the competition that does arise from the establishment of quasi-markets encourages schools to differentiate themselves from one another. An outcome of such policies of choice does result in diversity but such differentiation is organised around socio-economic status, ethnicity, religion and race (Reid, 2002). As Dempster, Freakley, & Parry (2001) emphasise market theory is not concerned with the degree to which "satisfaction of collective values" is met.…”
Section: Marketisation Of Education and New Public Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They develop social-bonding capital -that is, social bonding that is exclusionary and links only a few to each other (Putnam, 2000). This reinforces exclusion and means that private school students are limited in their exposure to multiple points of view and to the necessary processes of conflict resolution that develop awareness of the meaning of 'public' (Reid, 2002). As students may have a narrow view of goods as private, students may be less likely to understand, support and work for the concept of the public good.…”
Section: Current Ideologies That Damage the Public Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is eroding the public good by failing to see that private goods only exist and have meaning within the public good, and by removing curricular content and activities from schools that aim to develop students' understanding and awareness of the public good. Instead, teaching is narrowed to individualistic and competitive market ideology, and encased in the value of consumption and competition (Reid, 2002;Grimmett & Shaker, 2004;Power et al, 2008;Virag, 2010). Putnam (2000) provides much empirical evidence illustrating how community-mindednessan essential element for developing the public good and a key element of social capital -has been eroded over the twentieth century.…”
Section: Current Ideologies That Damage the Public Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%