Public Discourses of Climate Change in Hong Kong

Abstract

The changing political environment in Hong Kong is likely to accelerate the transition in environmental policy discourse. Opportunities for critical public involvement are increasing and new environmental discourses are emerging. Yet previous social surveys did not explore the range of these discourses and few focused on climate change. The paper outlines the public discourses of climate change in Hong Kong. Using Q-methodology, four distinctive discourses were identified, namely, Pure Environmentalism, Political Pragmatism, Popular Optimism, and Fair Rationalism. While the first one is climate-centric, the other three are political or social in nature and do not indicate a clear or coherent climate orientation. This suggests that the climate change concern of the Hong Kong public is not tightly embedded into a coherent narrative of social and institutional transformation. Effective climate change governance and policies require strengthening the link between such concern and the public desires for social and institutional transformation. Bringing together the ongoing social movements and environmental campaigns will be instrumental to nurture an active climate citizenry.

Mapping Discourses of Climate Change Adaptation in the United Kingdom

“…Qmethod has shown considerable value in exploring subjective perspectives on a range of environmental management issues ranging from energy (Cotton and Devine-Wright 2011;Cuppen et al 2010;Venables et al 2009), forestry (Steelman and Maguire 1999), to agriculture and conservation (Bumbudsanpharoke et al 2009). The method has also been applied in climate change (principally mitigation) perceptions and engagement research in recent years (Burke et al 2018;Lo 2016;O'Neill and Nicholson-Cole 2009;OÕNeill et al 2013), and this study aims to complement these findings through a specific emphasis on adaptation discourse within this broader field.…”

How climate change perception is reshaping attitudes towards the functional benefits of urban trees and green space: Lessons from Hong Kong

“…Efforts to turn the growing aspirations for greening into innovative solutions are sluggish and piecemeal (Jim, 2002;Jim and Chan, 2016). Many substantive benefits remain unseen or fail to materialize due to the entrenched community mentality and persistent institutional barriers (Jim, 2004;Lo and Jim, 2015;Lo, 2015Lo, , 2016a. Creative efforts are needed to enlist support from all stakeholders, and it would be instrumental to cite the importance of trees for coping with periodic climatic disturbance.…”

Governing climate change in Hong Kong: Prospects for market mechanisms in the context of emissions trading in China

“…Citizens and civil society alike have lost trust in the SAR government led by a pro‐Beijing chief executive in collusion with the private sector, property developers in particular. This has severely undermined the basis for the public–private partnerships and multi‐stakeholder governance required for ecological modernisation to work (Gouldson et al ., ; Hills, ; Wong and Wan, ; Lo, ). Ongoing political and land‐use disputes have further eroded the already low levels of trust, and the policy environment for political and business leadership continues to deteriorate.…”