2006
DOI: 10.3102/0013189x035008011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Discourses in Schools: Purposes, Problems, Possibilities

Abstract: Classroom discussion can play an important role in the formation of citizens, and in more ways than one. Yet recitation persists as the discursive norm in classrooms, and the literature on discussion lacks clarity as to purpose. This article contributes a delineation of two purposes—interpretation (enlightenment) and decision making (engagement)—and argues that they are elemental to both discussion pedagogy and citizen formation. As practices, they upend recitation and offer an occasion for liberal education, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
123
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
123
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As a means of pursuing these goals, civic education scholars have, for example, highlighted ways that controversial issue discussions can deepen understanding, promote political interest, and help students develop skills needed to craft well-warranted arguments (e.g., Campbell, 2008;Hess & McAvoy, 2015;Parker, 2006;Torney-Purta, 2002).…”
Section: Judging Political Claims: An Educational Prioritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a means of pursuing these goals, civic education scholars have, for example, highlighted ways that controversial issue discussions can deepen understanding, promote political interest, and help students develop skills needed to craft well-warranted arguments (e.g., Campbell, 2008;Hess & McAvoy, 2015;Parker, 2006;Torney-Purta, 2002).…”
Section: Judging Political Claims: An Educational Prioritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And finally, while this form of debate promoted reflection on certain issues of social justice, it did not ultimately translate into forms of social activism. Similar to Parker's (2006) study of the use of critical teaching methods such as the Socratic Circle, these debates encouraged students to take charge of their learning but it did not necessarily foster 'action-in-the-world'. The history of the country was contemplated and students later reflected on how they should act as individuals, but discussion of how to change social inequities was masked by the emphasis on reconciliation.…”
Section: Pedagogical Practices To Promote Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Parker (2006) believes classroom discussions, in which teachers and students are open to differences of opinion, can lead to enlightenment and engagement. Parker (2001) acknowledged that civic education "is a remarkable and daring undertaking" due to the fact that the citizen identity does not develop because of age and the school system is not the only factor in molding citizens (p. 6).…”
Section: Civic Education In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schools are able to develop public citizens who can better their community (Parker, 2005). Furthermore, schools can deter idiocy (Parker, 2005), which in turn, leads to enlightened and engaged citizens (Parker, 2006). …”
Section: Role Of Ses In the Civic Achievement Gap Of Hispanic Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%