2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public design of digital commons in urban places: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the suggestions to build new institutions while designing, the project is also seeing commonfare.net as a "digital commons" [46], and the research and design work done is questioning both the technologies and the social, economic, and political aspects of commonfare.net as the digital result of the infrastructuring process, with a particular focus on the concept of commonfare as a novel welfare model based on autonomous social collaboration.…”
Section: Case Study and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In line with the suggestions to build new institutions while designing, the project is also seeing commonfare.net as a "digital commons" [46], and the research and design work done is questioning both the technologies and the social, economic, and political aspects of commonfare.net as the digital result of the infrastructuring process, with a particular focus on the concept of commonfare as a novel welfare model based on autonomous social collaboration.…”
Section: Case Study and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference to publics shows how the self-organised group described by Bødker et al [4] could be one kind of social aggregates with which designers interact. This also raises the theme of what happens after design in terms of organisation and management, as discussed by Teli et al [46], foreseeing the possibility for newly aggregated publics to manage digital commons, intended as specific institutional forms. The difference between Bødker et al [4] and the "publics" lens points to different ways in which participation in the design and management of a digital artefact could be configured, and these differences are worth being exposed, as suggested by Vines et al [47].…”
Section: Strategies and Tacticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The motivations for people to voluntarily engage in a community has been discussed in several research fields [21,45]. Particularly relevant to this paper is the case of Open Source/Free Software (OS/FS) communities [2,17].…”
Section: Building Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%