2018
DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781771992152.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Deliberation on Climate Change: Lessons from Alberta Climate Dialogue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the heading of responsible innovation, the quality of such involvement mainly depends upon the timeliness of the conversation, the willingness of technoscientific professionals and institutions to learn and listen, and the diversity of participating stakeholders and publics (Bauer et al, 2021;Sykes and Macnaghten, 2013). A recurring challenge has been to involve people in marginalised positions (for example, due to their ethnic background or socio-economic position), because people from these communities are typically less politically active, not as used or able to voice their opinions, or less knowledgeable about the topic than those citizens who tend to be over-represented (Boulianne, 2018;Ellard-Gray et al, 2015;Powell et al, 2011;Sturgis, 2014).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Responsible Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the heading of responsible innovation, the quality of such involvement mainly depends upon the timeliness of the conversation, the willingness of technoscientific professionals and institutions to learn and listen, and the diversity of participating stakeholders and publics (Bauer et al, 2021;Sykes and Macnaghten, 2013). A recurring challenge has been to involve people in marginalised positions (for example, due to their ethnic background or socio-economic position), because people from these communities are typically less politically active, not as used or able to voice their opinions, or less knowledgeable about the topic than those citizens who tend to be over-represented (Boulianne, 2018;Ellard-Gray et al, 2015;Powell et al, 2011;Sturgis, 2014).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Responsible Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%