2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9030433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Debt, Corruption and Sustainable Economic Growth

Abstract: Abstract:There are many studies that look into the relationship between public debt and economic growth. It is hard to find, however, research addressing the role of corruption between these two variables. Noticing this vacancy in current literature, we strive to investigate the effect of corruption on the relationship between public debt and economic growth. For this purpose, the pooled ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects models and the dynamic panel generalized method of moments (GMM) models (Arellan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(110 reference statements)
9
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive effect occurs when institutional quality is high enough to ensure well-functioning government, which effectively distributes and allocates the borrowed funds to high value-added sectors. This conclusion to some extent is supported by Megersa and Cassimon (2015), Masuch et al (2016), Kim et al (2017) who include institutional quality and debt interaction variable into growth regression and find evidence that the negative effect of debt on growth is at least lower (if not turns to positive) when coupled with good policies and institutions. Megersa and Cassimon (2015) findings for 57 developing countries suggest that debt is detrimental for growth, however, harm is reduced while controlling the quality of public sector management.…”
Section: The Role Of Institutional Quality In Debt-growth Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The positive effect occurs when institutional quality is high enough to ensure well-functioning government, which effectively distributes and allocates the borrowed funds to high value-added sectors. This conclusion to some extent is supported by Megersa and Cassimon (2015), Masuch et al (2016), Kim et al (2017) who include institutional quality and debt interaction variable into growth regression and find evidence that the negative effect of debt on growth is at least lower (if not turns to positive) when coupled with good policies and institutions. Megersa and Cassimon (2015) findings for 57 developing countries suggest that debt is detrimental for growth, however, harm is reduced while controlling the quality of public sector management.…”
Section: The Role Of Institutional Quality In Debt-growth Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The state sector has always been an important element of many economies, including the most advanced ones [5]. Public debt has increased sharply since the 2008 financial crisis, especially in advanced countries [6]. According to the OECD, among the world's 2000 largest companies, 649 are located in Asia, of which about one third have at least 10% state ownership [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per capita income (Saha and Gounder, 2013;Wong, 1992), the share of importation of goods and services in GDP (Kim, 2017;Bai, 2014;Nauro Campos, 2012), economic openness (Bojnec Štefan, 2017), inflation (Wong, 1992) and tax are among all the variables which have been studied. In this study, we discus and evaluate the impact of per capita income, the size of government and inflation on fraud, and examine the combined effect of the economic variables on fraud.…”
Section: Economic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%