2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9184-2_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Datasets and Techniques for Segmentation of Anatomical Structures from Chest X-Rays: Comparitive Study, Current Trends and Future Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table V presents the Jaccard similarity coefficient of each contour on the validation dataset. The results confirmed our method provides comparable accuracy to previous works using the JSRT dataset and the NLM(MC) dataset [27], [28].…”
Section: A Segmentation Performance On Cross-databasesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Table V presents the Jaccard similarity coefficient of each contour on the validation dataset. The results confirmed our method provides comparable accuracy to previous works using the JSRT dataset and the NLM(MC) dataset [27], [28].…”
Section: A Segmentation Performance On Cross-databasesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Table 3 presents Dice indices of lung segmentation results. Compared to both the U-Net and the XLSor of Dice index 0.976, which is currently SOTA performance of deep-learning based normal lung segmentation (Jangam and Rao, 2018), the proposed methods showed comparable Dice index in addition to providing su- perb performance for the abnormal CXR.…”
Section: Unsupervised Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 96%