Public biofoundries as innovation intermediaries: the integration of translation, sustainability, and responsibility

Abstract

The emergence and evolution of engineering biology, and its potential to address multiple global challenges is associated with the rise of biofoundries. These innovation intermediaries are facilities that employ advanced automation and computational analytics to accelerate engineering biology applications. Yet, for biofoundries to fully achieve their promise of generating applications that address grand societal challenges, they need to meet three key challenges: translation of research technology and its commercialization, attention to sustainability, and responsible innovation. Using web content analysis and interviews, this paper explores the functions and capabilities undertaken by existing public biofoundries, the extent to which they address these three challenges, and opportunities and models for enhancement. We also probe the roles undertaken by three other contrasting types of innovation intermediaries to identify practices and opportunities for integration and partnering with public biofoundries. We find that public biofoundries exhibit relatively strong capabilities for research translation, whereas efforts toward sustainability and responsibility are generally less prominent. For biofoundry enhancement, we propose an organisational model based on external partnering where public biofoundries are positioned as intermediaries within regional innovation systems. The framework put forward is reproducible and could be used in other contexts for assessing innovation intermediary organisational functions and capabilities toward meeting societal challenges.

Building the bioeconomy: A targeted assessment approach to identifying biobased technologies, challenges and opportunities

“…In particular, enhanced coordination and funding are needed to (1) support biobased production progression along circular value chains comprising feedstocks, biomanufacturing, marketable goods, and sustainable consumption (see, e.g. [ 129 ]); (2) foster innovation scale‐up, support SMEs, and de‐risk technological development investment; (3) strengthen roles for public and private intermediaries in supporting bioeconomy transitions [ 130 ]; and (4) enhancing capabilities for detailed techno‐economic, sustainability, and societal assessments to guide decision‐making and investment. There is a need for (5) better infrastructure for the accumulation and processing of waste for its use as feedstock and for (6) legislative and policy changes to generate frameworks and incentives for sustainable biobased transition and long‐run support for systematic change.…”

The Development and Testing of an Early, Rapid Sustainability Assessment Tool for Responsible Innovation in Engineering Biology

“…To align with contemporary concepts of sustainability, innovation sustainable innovations must internalise wider social, economic, and environmental impacts compared with traditional innovations, while still having to overcome 'classic' problems such as scale-up and diffusion (Raworth, 2017;Watkins et al, 2023). In addition, a range of theoretical and practical advances highlight the importance of reflection on the purposes and potential impacts of a given innovation (Schillo and Robinson, 2017).…”