2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public attitudes towards depression and schizophrenia in an urban Turkish sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a household survey in 2006 in the United States, 74% of the public expressed an unwillingness to work with the individual described in a vignette when it concerned someone with alcohol dependence, against 62% and 47% when the individual in the vignette described had schizophrenia or depression, respectively [ 15 ]. Similar patterns are found in more recent studies in different countries, where depicted individuals with schizophrenia elicited more stigmatizing attitudes than individuals with depression [ 14 , 16 , 17 ], and individuals with alcoholism more than individuals with schizophrenia [ 13 , 18 ]. In addition, familiarity or contact with someone with a mental illness is associated with more positive responses toward people with a mental illness [ 19 – 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, in a household survey in 2006 in the United States, 74% of the public expressed an unwillingness to work with the individual described in a vignette when it concerned someone with alcohol dependence, against 62% and 47% when the individual in the vignette described had schizophrenia or depression, respectively [ 15 ]. Similar patterns are found in more recent studies in different countries, where depicted individuals with schizophrenia elicited more stigmatizing attitudes than individuals with depression [ 14 , 16 , 17 ], and individuals with alcoholism more than individuals with schizophrenia [ 13 , 18 ]. In addition, familiarity or contact with someone with a mental illness is associated with more positive responses toward people with a mental illness [ 19 – 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results are consistent with previous literature, where higher levels on the discrimination dimension of the ISMI have also been found in people with SMI versus other diagnoses (Fadipe et al, 2018;Ran et al, 2017;Szcze niak et al, 2018). These findings emphasize discrimination against people with SMI, which may be due to the fact that schizophrenia and similar diagnoses are associated with more stigmatising attributions, such as inability to recover, blame, and stereotypes (Wood et al, 2014), and therefore people show greater desire for social distance (Utz et al, 2019), which often ends up in more negative behaviours towards these people. The effects of discrimination are numerous, including increased time in accessing health care resources (Gronholm et al, 2017;Kular et al, 2019), and even in relation with depressive symptomatology and a longer disease duration (Pellet et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These results are consistent with global findings as well as country‐specific findings that suggest that over 70% of people with common and severe mental illness report do not seek professional help. 40 Public stigma against mental illness remains a major barrier to seeking appropriate treatment for people with mental illness apart from structural barriers such as cost and accessibility due to distance. These findings have implications for the restructuring of mental health care service delivery; involving private and traditional health care providers, and training and supervising their ability to detect and manage common mental illness may help surmount barriers to service utilization; and preliminary evidence of these strategies is available from Asian settings and needs further evaluation in other regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%