Public Acceptability of E-Mental Health Treatment Services for Psychological Problems: A Scoping Review

Abstract

BackgroundOver the past decades, the deficient provision of evidence-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of mental health problems has become a global challenge across health care systems. In view of the ongoing diffusion of new media and mobile technologies into everyday life, Web-delivered electronic mental health (e-mental health) treatment services have been suggested to expand the access to professional help. However, the large-scale dissemination and adoption of innovative e-mental health services is progressing slowly. This discrepancy between potential and actual impact in public health makes it essential to explore public acceptability of e-mental health treatment services across health care systems.ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify and evaluate recent empirical evidence for public acceptability, service preferences, and attitudes toward e-mental health treatments. On the basis of both frameworks for technology adoption and previous research, we defined (1) perceived helpfulness and (2) intentions to use e-mental health treatment services as indicators for public acceptability in the respective general population of reviewed studies. This mapping should reduce heterogeneity and help derive implications for systematic reviews and public health strategies.MethodsWe systematically searched electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Psyndex, PsycARTICLES, and Cochrane Library, using reference management software for parallel searches) to identify surveys published in English in peer-reviewed journals between January 2010 and December 2015, focusing on public perceptions about e-mental health treatments outside the context of clinical, psychosocial, or diagnostic interventions. Both indicators were obtained from previous review. Exclusion criteria further involved studies targeting specific groups or programs.ResultsThe simultaneous database search identified 76 nonduplicate records. Four articles from Europe and Australia were included in this scoping review. Sample sizes ranged from 217 to 2411 participants of ages 14-95 years. All included studies used cross-sectional designs and self-developed measures for outcomes related to both defined indicators of public acceptability. Three surveys used observational study designs, whereas one study was conducted as an experiment investigating the impact of brief educational information on attitudes. Taken together, the findings of included surveys suggested that e-mental health treatment services were perceived as less helpful than traditional face-to-face interventions. Additionally, intentions to future use e-mental health treatments were overall smaller in comparison to face-to-face services. Professional support was essential for help-seeking intentions in case of psychological distress. Therapist-assisted e-mental health services were preferred over unguided programs. Unexpectedly, assumed associations between familiarity with Web-based self-help for health purposes or “e-awareness” and intentions to use e-mental health servi...

Does self-help increase rates of help seeking for student mental health problems by minimizing stigma as a barrier?

“…A recent review of four survey studies found that participants consistently reported low intentions to use online therapy, particularly self-help, relative to in-person treatment from a mental health professional. 16 Survey research has similarly found that few people prefer self-help books relative to in-person treatment. 17,18 However, none of these studies were conducted specifically among college students, who due to their age and contextual factors may be more willing to adopt such technologies.…”

Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study (Preprint)

“…However, the role of attachment styles in the readiness to use eMHS remains unclear [52], especially concerning different delivery modes of internet interventions that vary in the degree of human support. Taken together, the identification of determinants of attitudes and preferences to eMHS is at an early stage [34]. The present study will address this research gap.…”

“…Yet, there are indicators commonly discussed as influential for help-seeking intentions and acceptance of eMHS, such as attitudes [33][34][35] and "e-preferences" [28].…”

“…In accordance to the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) [38], performance expectancy (i.e. how useful an individual perceives an intervention for reaching a specific goal) might thus play an important role in the adoption and acceptance of internet interventions [39,40], and provide a guideline in overcoming current limitations in the acceptability of eMHS [34,39,41,42].…”

Why urban Indians are interested in an internet based self-care app for depression? a brief pilot survey

“…21 A scoping review meant to understand public acceptability of e-interventions concluded that these were perceived as less helpful than face-to face interventions. 22 Moreover, therapist-assisted e-interventions were preferred over unguided ones. However studies used in this review employed general population samples, making it difficult to arrive at a clear understanding of the needs and motives that drive actual uptake of internet based interventions.…”