1985
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330680215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pubic symphysis age distributions

Abstract: A further discussion of age assessment and palaeodemography requires detailed reviews of methods, especially pubic symphysis techniques. Before reanalysis of changes in symphyseal form, the initial steps in distributing ages must be examined. Use of the mean values for age scores gives age distributions that are not real, but subject to systematic distortions, and cumulative percentages of skeletal samples can be shown to reflect the mean ages. Distributing skeletal ages using 95% probability distributions pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 As the human body matures, the pubic symphysis undergoes biomechanical, 41 degenerative, 39 and morphological changes. 19 In addition, anatomical differences exist between male and female pelves with the female symphysis being somewhat shorter and broader than that of the male. 32 These gender differences have been shown to affect joint mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…32 As the human body matures, the pubic symphysis undergoes biomechanical, 41 degenerative, 39 and morphological changes. 19 In addition, anatomical differences exist between male and female pelves with the female symphysis being somewhat shorter and broader than that of the male. 32 These gender differences have been shown to affect joint mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In forensic science, anthropology, and archaeology, many studies deal with the estimation of chronological age in humans, but few are devoted to studying the accuracy and reliability of the results. The most widespread methods for age estimation are based on skeletal indicators such as epiphysial fusion [1][2][3], hand-wrist bones [4][5][6][7][8], changes in the pubic symphysis [9][10][11][12], fusion of cranial sutures [12,13], dental maturation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and combined method [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-at-death estimates are vexing because they try to correlate physiological age and chronological age in a system that has differential development and deterioration. Variation in development and deterioration of the skeletal system differs among individuals as well as across populations and between the sexes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Differences can be attributed to socioeconomic status, cultural differences, genetic differences, differences in behavior, environmental factors, diet, and disease (16,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%