2019
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Puberty in the Last 25 Years: A Retrospective Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract: Puberty research has been highly productive in the past few decades and is gaining momentum. We conducted an analysis of bibliographic data, including titles, abstracts, keywords, indexing terms, and citation data to assess the sheer numbers, audience and reach, publication types, and impact of puberty-related publications. Findings suggest that puberty-related publications are increasing in sheer numbers, and have reach in many fields as befits an interdisciplinary science. Puberty-related publications typica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In tackling these challenges, it is important to recognize that current pubertal research resides in silos across fields such as medicine, genetics, psychology, anthropology, neuroscience, public health, and epidemiology (see Marceau et al, , in press), each with its own focus. Discipline‐specific foci drive diverging theoretical models, definitions, terminology, and research designs, which create large and often impenetrable divides between fields, and in turn prevent them from coming together to answer cross‐cutting questions about pubertal development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In tackling these challenges, it is important to recognize that current pubertal research resides in silos across fields such as medicine, genetics, psychology, anthropology, neuroscience, public health, and epidemiology (see Marceau et al, , in press), each with its own focus. Discipline‐specific foci drive diverging theoretical models, definitions, terminology, and research designs, which create large and often impenetrable divides between fields, and in turn prevent them from coming together to answer cross‐cutting questions about pubertal development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding normative pubertal processes has provided important foundational knowledge for the field. However, existing scholarship largely has focused on girls and on individuals of European descent (see Marceau, Hottle, & Yatcilla, , in this issue). Inadequately addressing certain populations in sufficient depth limits our understanding of the broad range of experiences associated with puberty, across individuals, and within certain populations.…”
Section: Puberty Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we recognize our two searches were not exhaustive (e.g., other databases could have been used, more years searched), we did want to provide a few examples to illustrate what is being published regarding puberty. We also refer the reader to Marceau, Hottle, & Yatcilla (, in this issue) on complementary search of the literature reported in this issue. Our results follow.…”
Section: Advancing the Science Of Puberty Involves Multiple Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of the baseline data suggest that there is sufficient variance to relate individual differences in pubertal development to other measures (5). Furthermore, the field of pubertal research has largely focused on girls of European descent, and examination of puberty in males and in racially/ethnically diverse participants fills in critical knowledge gaps (10,11).…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%