“…Recently, in order to overcome the shortcomings and improve the curative effect, increasing attention has been paid to platinum(IV) complexes as potential antitumor agents. − It is widely believed that platinum(IV) complexes are often considered as prodrugs because they could be effectively converted to the cytotoxic platinum(II) component through bioreduction in the presence of intracellular reductants. − Furthermore, platinum(IV) complexes are more stable kinetically than that of platinum(II)-based drugs owing to the low-spin d 6 octahedral geometry center, preventing many side reactions with biological substances before attacking DNA double strands . More importantly, the two axial ligands introduced in platinum(IV) complexes could be used to promote tumor-targeting ability or bioavailability and enhance cellular uptake, respectively. , Therefore, multifunctional platinum(IV) complexes are an effective strategy to enhance antitumor efficacy, overcome the drug resistance, and reduce the side effects of the conventional platinum(II)-based drugs because of the different mechanism of antitumor action. For example, multifunctional platinum(IV) complexes (Figure ), such as CX-4945-platinum(IV), chalcone-platinum(IV), , chlorambucil-platinum(IV), BBI-608-platinum(IV), pterostilbene-platinum(IV), evodiamine-platinum(IV), fenofibric acid-platinum(IV), ketoprofen-platinum(IV), PARPis-platinum(IV), and so on, not only displayed stronger antitumor activity than that of cisplatin both in vitro and in vivo but also exhibited low toxicity toward normal tissue in cisplatin-sensitive or -resistant tumor xenograft models.…”