2015
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PTU-041 Colonoscopic perforations in the english nhs bowel cancer screening programme (nhsbcsp)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the low PPV, many participants undergoing repeat screening will be subject to additional unnecessary diagnostic investigation, with the accompanying risk of adverse events, such as colonoscopic perforation, and the potential for psychological distress. [22][23][24][25] Furthermore, additional colonoscopies will increase cost and place additional demand on overburdened endoscopy services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the low PPV, many participants undergoing repeat screening will be subject to additional unnecessary diagnostic investigation, with the accompanying risk of adverse events, such as colonoscopic perforation, and the potential for psychological distress. [22][23][24][25] Furthermore, additional colonoscopies will increase cost and place additional demand on overburdened endoscopy services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derbyshire et al aimed to evaluate the overall rate of perforations in the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme consisting of over 263 129 endoscopic procedures carried out in more than 31 bowel cancer screening centers. 1 Overall, 147 perforations were identified (rate of 0.06%). 69.2% of perforations were therapeutic and the endoscopists visualized the perforation in 12.8% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%