2011
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PTEN Loss Confers BRAF Inhibitor Resistance to Melanoma Cells through the Suppression of BIM Expression

Abstract: This study addresses the role of PTEN loss in intrinsic resistance to the BRAF inhibitor PLX4720. Immunohistochemical staining of a tissue array covering all stages of melanocytic neoplasia (n ¼ 192) revealed PTEN expression to be lost in >10% of all melanoma cases. Although PTEN expression status did not predict for sensitivity to the growth inhibitory effects of PLX4720, it was predictive for apoptosis, with only limited cell death observed in melanomas lacking PTEN expression (PTENÀ). Mechanistically, PLX47… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
430
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 497 publications
(449 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
11
430
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• Clinical therapeutics for advanced-stage melanoma have improved dramatically with the development of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking antibodies, and a modified oncolytic herpes virus that is delivered intratumourally • The overall survival of patients with advanced-stage melanoma has improved from ~9 months before 2011 to an as yet undefined timeframe, with a subset of patients having ongoing long-term tumour control • Melanoma, particularly cutaneous melanoma, is amendable to immunotherapy for various reasons, including extensive tumour infiltration by T cells, a high mutational load, and crosstalk between oncogenic signalling pathways and immunobiology • Resistance mechanisms to BRAF-targeted treatments and immunotherapies are being elucidated; reactivation of the MAPK pathway is common after BRAF inhibition, whereas the effectiveness of both approaches might be limited by loss of tumour antigen presentation and T-cell trafficking • To move the field of clinical therapeutics forward, a greater focus on specific patient populations (based on serum lactose dehydrogenase levels, ECOG performance status, and number of metastases), as well as on landmark progression-free and overall survival measures, will be required in clinical trials occur with or without BRAF, NRAS, or NF1 alterations, but are known to cooperate in driving resistance to BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines 19 and biopsy samples of resistant tumours 20,21 .…”
Section: Genetic and Immune Landscape Of Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Clinical therapeutics for advanced-stage melanoma have improved dramatically with the development of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking antibodies, and a modified oncolytic herpes virus that is delivered intratumourally • The overall survival of patients with advanced-stage melanoma has improved from ~9 months before 2011 to an as yet undefined timeframe, with a subset of patients having ongoing long-term tumour control • Melanoma, particularly cutaneous melanoma, is amendable to immunotherapy for various reasons, including extensive tumour infiltration by T cells, a high mutational load, and crosstalk between oncogenic signalling pathways and immunobiology • Resistance mechanisms to BRAF-targeted treatments and immunotherapies are being elucidated; reactivation of the MAPK pathway is common after BRAF inhibition, whereas the effectiveness of both approaches might be limited by loss of tumour antigen presentation and T-cell trafficking • To move the field of clinical therapeutics forward, a greater focus on specific patient populations (based on serum lactose dehydrogenase levels, ECOG performance status, and number of metastases), as well as on landmark progression-free and overall survival measures, will be required in clinical trials occur with or without BRAF, NRAS, or NF1 alterations, but are known to cooperate in driving resistance to BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines 19 and biopsy samples of resistant tumours 20,21 .…”
Section: Genetic and Immune Landscape Of Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, loss of PTEN activity in BRaf mutant cells can lead to lower levels of proapoptotic Bim through hyperactivated Akt, which can result in resistance to BRaf inhibitors 84 .…”
Section: Current Therapies In the Treatment Of Metastatic Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common resistant mechanism is MAPK pathway reactivation, which is caused by genetic mutation of MEK or different Ras isoforms (7)(8)(9), upstream activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) such as FGFR3 and c-Met (10,11), expression of B-RAF V600E splice variants that dimerize in presence of the B-RAF inhibitor (12), amplification of B-RAF (13,14), and upregulation of MAP3Ks such as COT or C-RAF (15,16). Alternatively, activation of MAPKredundant pathways such as PI3K/Akt as a consequence of PTEN loss (17) or overexpression of RTKs such as PDGFRb and IGF1R have also been reported to induce resistance in B-RAF V600E melanoma (7,18,19). In addition, secretion of growth factors such as HGF or FGF has also been implicated in resistance to B-RAF inhibition (10,11,20,21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%