2010
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-4295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PTEN Loss Compromises Homologous Recombination Repair in Astrocytes: Implications for Glioblastoma Therapy with Temozolomide or Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Abstract: Glioblastomas (GBM) are lethal brain tumors that are highly resistant to therapy. The only meaningful improvement in therapeutic response came from use of the S N 1-type alkylating agent temozolomide in combination with ionizing radiation. However, no genetic markers that might predict a better response to DNA alkylating agents have been identified in GBMs, except for loss of O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase via promoter methylation. In this study, using genetically defined primary murine astrocytes as … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
144
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
144
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Progression-free survival was signifi cantly longer in the BRCA mutant subgroup (HR 0·27, 95% CI 0·16-0·44, p<0·0001) and LOH high subgroup (HR 0·62, 0·42-0·90, p=0·011) than in the LOH low subgroup (fi gure 2A). 12 month progressionfree survival was higher in the BRCA mutant subgroup (50%, 95% CI 33-65) and LOH high subgroup (28%, 18-39) than in the LOH low subgroup (10%, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The proportionality of hazards assumption was not violated (appendix pp [4][5]15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Progression-free survival was signifi cantly longer in the BRCA mutant subgroup (HR 0·27, 95% CI 0·16-0·44, p<0·0001) and LOH high subgroup (HR 0·62, 0·42-0·90, p=0·011) than in the LOH low subgroup (fi gure 2A). 12 month progressionfree survival was higher in the BRCA mutant subgroup (50%, 95% CI 33-65) and LOH high subgroup (28%, 18-39) than in the LOH low subgroup (10%, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The proportionality of hazards assumption was not violated (appendix pp [4][5]15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formalin-fi xed paraffi n-embedded archival and pretreatment tumour biopsies of adequate quality were required for each patient. A complete list of inclusion and exclusion criteria is provided in the appendix (pp [16][17].…”
Section: Added Value Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying spacer length in compound 17, with one methylene unit shorter (15) or longer (16), did not improve activity and indicated optimal positioning of the aromatic ring in 17. Of the substituted benzyl series, fluoro (18)(19)(20), nitro (21-22) and p-hydroxy (23) analogues showed comparable activity. A polar substrate, such as pacetamidomethyl (24) and carboxylic acid (25-26), were detrimental, while 3,4-dichloro (27) conferred a slight improvement.…”
Section: Ar T Ic Le In F O Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differing sensitivity profiles to RAD51 inhibition are reflected in the IC 50 values and the corresponding dose-curves (Supporting Information Figure S1). BT549 cells contain a PTEN mutation, which compromises HR activity 20 , reflected by a gentler sloped dose curve in response to RAD51 inhibition. However, RAD51 inhibition was minimally toxic to normal breast epithelial cell line MCF10A which has unperturbed access to both HR and NHEJ repair pathways (IC 50 ~ 48 µM, Table 1), suggesting a promising role in selectively inhibiting aggressive, metastatic breast cancer cells rather than normal cells.…”
Section: Ar T Ic Le In F O Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We and others have developed astrocytoma nGEM using primary cells -astrocytes, NSC, or oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC) -harvested from GEM [30][31][32][33][34] . The rationale behind the development of an astrocytoma nGEM was to create a model to determine the phenotypic consequences of oncogenic mutations in specific cell types that could potentially be used for preclinical drug testing in vitro and in vivo in immune-competent animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%