“…Previous works on controlling potentials were carried out using Ag/Ag + nonaqueous references for their supposed stability, versatility, and ease of use. , However, these electrodes suffer from several drawbacks that intercalation materials such as LiFePO 4 can address: (i) For Ag/Ag + references it is necessary to enclose the reference electrolyte within a fritted tube, creating a junction potential at the frit interface which can actually be unstable , nonreproducible , and variable between electrolytes , , preventing cross-electrolyte comparison and electrochemical analysis of activity coefficients of the active species in solution (which is possible with LiFePO 4 , see discussion in Figure ). (ii) Ag + ions tend to leak through that same frit into the bulk electrolyte and can affect electrochemistry by coplating with lithium for instance. ,, (iii) Ag/Ag + references need to be freshly prepared for every experiment since the Ag salts used to make their electrolyte are light-sensitive and degrade rather quickly . (iv) These Ag salts are also hygroscopic: this accelerates degradation and may strongly affect N 2 reduction experiments because of its sensitivity to water content in the electrolyte. , Going back to LiFePO 4 , its reported tedious preparationcarried out using an electrolyte that is essentially the same as the one where the electrode will then be usedis not as challenging as it seems and has been swiftly adapted from commonly used Li-ion battery electrolytes (e.g., LiPF 6 in cyclic/linear carbonate). , In an Ar glovebox, a LiFePO 4 disc (Ø 18 mm) was assembled in a coin cell (Figure S1a) at the positive side, against a Li metal negative electrode, separated by a glass fiber separator wetted with 1 M LiNTf 2 (i.e., LiN(SO 2 CF 3 ) 2 ) in THF (omitting ethanol due to incompatibility of lithium with proton sources).…”