2002
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychotic Symptoms in an Urban General Medicine Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
107
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that subclinical psychotic experiences have a negative impact on the clinical manifestation of depression, both in terms of severity and of development over time, concurs with earlier work in the general population (Olfson et al 2002;van Rossum et al 2011;Wigman et al 2012) as well as in a clinical sample (Perlis et al 2011). In the latter, it was shown that depressed individuals with psychotic experiences responded less well to four consecutive pharmacological interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our finding that subclinical psychotic experiences have a negative impact on the clinical manifestation of depression, both in terms of severity and of development over time, concurs with earlier work in the general population (Olfson et al 2002;van Rossum et al 2011;Wigman et al 2012) as well as in a clinical sample (Perlis et al 2011). In the latter, it was shown that depressed individuals with psychotic experiences responded less well to four consecutive pharmacological interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3,13 Studies from the developed world have also indicated that the presence of psychotic symptoms in community samples is associated with significantly more role impairment, higher rates of service use and hospitalization as well as increased rates of suicidal ideation. 4,9 These findings need further replication in large representative community based samples within the African context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, the racial/ethnic classification was validated using data collected as part of a distinct study having self-reported racial/ethnic data in 1007 patients followed in one of our clinical sites. 55,56 Using the self-reported data as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the CIS database was 67% for Hispanics and 72% for African Americans, and the specificity was 94% for both Hispanics and African Americans. This misclassification would have resulted in an underrepresentation of the proportion of minority women included in the analysis and biased the results toward the null.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%