Psychotherapy supervision in small leader-led groups

Counselman, Eleanor F.; Gumpert, Peter

doi:10.1007/bf01419603

Cited by 18 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A distinguishing factor among the triad and group models is whether they include a formal supervisor leader, rotate the supervisor/leader role among the members, are leaderless, or gradually move towards being leaderless as the group matures. There are advantages and disadvantages for each approach, with the experience level of group members often being an important decision point around the need for a leader (see also, Counselman & Gumpert, 1993; Counselman & Weber, 2004). Leaders, whether formal supervisors or rotating members, typically keep the group on task and attend to group dynamics.…”

Section: Triadic and Group Peer Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dyadic, triadic, and group models of peer supervision/consultation: What are their components, and is there evidence of their effectiveness?

Borders

2012

Clinical Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Models that meet the Psychology Board of Australia's definition of peer consultation include dyadic, triadic, and group formats. Components of these models (e.g., goals, theoretical basis, role of leader, members' roles, structure, and steps in procedure, stages in group development) are presented, and evidence of their effectiveness is reviewed. Psychologists are encouraged to identify the model components and goals that match their own learning goals for continuing professional development.

show abstract

Section: Triadic and Group Peer Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dyadic, triadic, and group models of peer supervision/consultation: What are their components, and is there evidence of their effectiveness?

Borders

2012

Clinical Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Individual and group supervision, unlike peer consultation, involves a leader, an ''expert'' who holds competency educationally and experientially along with specific medical=legal responsibilities. The advantages of group supervision over individual supervision have been proposed for some time (Baruch, 2009;Carroll, 1996;Counselman & Gumpert, 1993). Supervision groups are able to offer a wide variety of answers to clinical and professional issues (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993;Kadushin & Harkness, 2002), they are cost-effective (Counselman & Weber, 2004), and provide opportunities for learning from parallel process (McNeill & Worthen, 1989;Milne, 2009).…”

Section: Peer Supervision Groupsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The advantages of group supervision over individual supervision have been proposed for some time (Baruch, 2009;Carroll, 1996;Counselman & Gumpert, 1993). Supervision groups are able to offer a wide variety of answers to clinical and professional issues (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993;Kadushin & Harkness, 2002), they are cost-effective (Counselman & Weber, 2004), and provide opportunities for learning from parallel process (McNeill & Worthen, 1989;Milne, 2009). They also reduce professional isolation (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993) and therapist burnout.…”

Section: Peer Supervision Groupsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…They also reduce professional isolation (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993) and therapist burnout. It has been argued that group process has the potential to reduce therapist shame about perceived mistakes (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993).…”

Section: Peer Supervision Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Supervision groups are able to offer a wide variety of answers to clinical and professional issues (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993;Kadushin & Harkness, 2002), they are cost-effective (Counselman & Weber, 2004), and provide opportunities for learning from parallel process (McNeill & Worthen, 1989;Milne, 2009). They also reduce professional isolation (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993) and therapist burnout. It has been argued that group process has the potential to reduce therapist shame about perceived mistakes (Counselman & Gumpert, 1993).…”

Section: Peer Supervision Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Personal Construct Peer Consultation: Caring for the Psychotherapists

Truneckova

Viney

Maitland

et al. 2010

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of personal construct models of supervision has been following the research into the psychological well-being of psychotherapists. In response to these investigations a personal construct model for peer consultation groups was developed. Along with the model's basic assumptions, there is an account of the group processes taking place. The clinical implications generated by these processes of facilitation are provided, followed by an account of the peer consultation group, the history, aims, objectives, and processes. A measure was developed to evaluate the consultation process of the peer group. Examples of evaluative processes are presented. The usefulness of the model and the evaluation measure are discussed. Next, the clinical implications of personal construct peer group consultation are investigated along with the capacity of this model to ''care'' for group members.

show abstract