2023
DOI: 10.1037/pst0000483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychotherapy skills and methods: Introduction to the special issue.

Abstract: This article introduces the special issue of Psychotherapy on evidence-based skills and methods and concomitantly, outlines the purposes and processes of the Interorganizational Task Force that guided the work. We provide the rationale for reviewing psychotherapy skills and methods, define and contrast skills and methods with other components of psychotherapy, describe how to assess skills, methods, and outcomes (immediate in-session, intermediate, and distal), how to link skills and methods with outcomes, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other end of the spectrum, no therapy skill or method was determined to be demonstrably effective for immediate outcomes, and these were rarely analyzed by quantitative meta-analyses because it was not possible. As noted in the introductory article (Hill & Norcross, in press), it is easier to study distal outcomes (which are typically based on patient self-report of symptom changes) than immediate in-session outcomes (which typically require labor-intensive coding of microprocesses by trained judges).…”
Section: Research Evidence For the Effectiveness Of The Skills/methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other end of the spectrum, no therapy skill or method was determined to be demonstrably effective for immediate outcomes, and these were rarely analyzed by quantitative meta-analyses because it was not possible. As noted in the introductory article (Hill & Norcross, in press), it is easier to study distal outcomes (which are typically based on patient self-report of symptom changes) than immediate in-session outcomes (which typically require labor-intensive coding of microprocesses by trained judges).…”
Section: Research Evidence For the Effectiveness Of The Skills/methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%