Psychotherapy and privileged communications in child custody cases.

Knapp, Samuel; VandeCreek, Leon

doi:10.1037/0735-7028.16.3.398

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Table 1 Confidential Communications To a School Psychologist1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2009

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The client may voluntarily waive privilege (i.e., give consent for the psychologist to disclose privileged communications), and then the psychologist must provide relevant testimony (Jacob & Hartshorne, 2007). The waiver belongs to the client, and the psychologist has no independent right to invoke privilege against the client's wishes (Knapp & VandeCreek, 1985). People v. Vincent Moreno (2005).…”

Section: Table 1 Confidential Communications To a School Psychologistmentioning

confidence: 99%

Privileged communication in the school psychologist–client relationship

Jacob

Powers

2009

Psychology in the Schools

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the years since the 1996 Supreme Court Jaffee v. Redmond decision, many states broadened the scope of their laws governing privilege to include non‐doctoral school psychologists. This article addresses the meaning of the term privileged communication and identifies common exceptions to privilege. Findings from a computerized search of the status of privileged communication between school psychologists and their clients in all states are reported. Implications of privilege communication laws for the delivery of school psychological services are discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Section: Table 1 Confidential Communications To a School Psychologistmentioning

confidence: 99%