2017
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1315464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychotherapist trainees’ professional self-doubt and negative personal reaction: Changes during cognitive behavioral therapy and association with patient progress

Abstract: Patients' progress is associated with therapists' experiences of difficulties. Yet, trait- and state-based difficulties lead to different results. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: Associations between therapists' difficulties and patient-reported outcomes depended on whether therapists' difficulties were assessed once across all patients (trait-level) or for each individual patient repeatedly during CBT (state-level). Contrary to previous research on trait-level difficulties, the diffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
43
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The TDS‐IP is a patient‐specific adaptation of the TDS (Orlinsky & Rønnestad, ) from the International Study on the Development of Psychotherapists (ISDP; Orlinsky & Rønnestad, ). For more information about the construction of the TDS‐IP see Odyniec, Victor, Berner, and Willutzki () and Odyniec et al (). The TDS‐IP focuses on the patient–therapist dyad and can be interpreted as therapists’ state‐based difficulties by asking the therapists about the frequency of difficulties they experienced with each of their patients at several time points over the course of therapy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The TDS‐IP is a patient‐specific adaptation of the TDS (Orlinsky & Rønnestad, ) from the International Study on the Development of Psychotherapists (ISDP; Orlinsky & Rønnestad, ). For more information about the construction of the TDS‐IP see Odyniec, Victor, Berner, and Willutzki () and Odyniec et al (). The TDS‐IP focuses on the patient–therapist dyad and can be interpreted as therapists’ state‐based difficulties by asking the therapists about the frequency of difficulties they experienced with each of their patients at several time points over the course of therapy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…” followed by the different core items. Thus, it is possible to assess therapists’ difficulties contextualized for a particular therapist–patient dyad with the TDS‐IP (Odyniec et al, ). With 19 items the TDS‐IP assesses three subscales: “professional self‐doubt”, “negative personal reaction”, and “frustrating treatment case.” Nissen‐Lie et al () showed that PSD and NPR accounted for a meaningful amount of variance in early patient‐rated alliance and outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations