2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial outcomes as motivations for urban gardening: A cross-cultural comparison of Swiss and Chilean gardeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the six indicators validated in the Web-Delphi for built environment dimensions, the “Area of community gardens” indicator was the one with the lowest agreement. Home and Vieli [ 64 ] state that urban agriculture performed in community gardens can meet some of the basic nutrition needs of the urban population and potentially provide economic, social, and mental and wellbeing benefits. During the interviews, the advantage of including this indicator was clear (83% agreement rate) while in the Web-Delphi this indicator achieved a rate of agreement of 55%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the six indicators validated in the Web-Delphi for built environment dimensions, the “Area of community gardens” indicator was the one with the lowest agreement. Home and Vieli [ 64 ] state that urban agriculture performed in community gardens can meet some of the basic nutrition needs of the urban population and potentially provide economic, social, and mental and wellbeing benefits. During the interviews, the advantage of including this indicator was clear (83% agreement rate) while in the Web-Delphi this indicator achieved a rate of agreement of 55%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the special benefited groups, only 16 articles [27,28,31,33,34,36,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] have recorded such specific benefited groups from particular urban agriculture practices, which include older adults, migrants, low-income people, disabled people, people with mental disorders, school children, cancer patients, and women (Table S1). However, the Health and emotional benefits were recorded more than twice as much in developed countries [17,26,27,36,[38][39][40]46,47,49,50,52,53,[56][57][58][59][60][61] compared to developing countries [29,59,[62][63][64][65][66] (Table 2). The top three health and emotional sub-categories recorded in developed countries are food nutrition and quality, connection with nature, physical activity, and mental relaxation.…”
Section: Special Benefited Groups Land Ownership and Government Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recording of environmental education sub-categories has similar frequencies in both developed and developing countries (Figure 5c). There is no significant difference in recording economic benefits between developed [5,28,30,[32][33][34]36,38,39,[47][48][49]53,54,56,57,61,[69][70][71] and developing countries [9,12,21,22,31,[42][43][44]59,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68]72] (Table 2). However, a distinction can be observed among recordings of different sub-categories.…”
Section: Special Benefited Groups Land Ownership and Government Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations