2011
DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2010.541256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial correlates of internet use among Italian students

Abstract: Davis (2001) introduced a cognitive-behavioral theory of generalized pathological internet use (GPIU) that attempts to model the etiology, development, and outcomes associated with PIU. According to this model, pre-existing psychosocial problems (depression, loneliness, or low levels of social support) predispose an individual to GPIU cognitions, behaviors, and negative outcomes. An exploratory study intended to investigate whether GPIU is associated with psychosocial health (loneliness, depression, self-estee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the Internet Addiction Test (IAT; Young, 1998), the most used instrument for assessing PIU, the GPIUS2 is specifically focused on problematic use that arises due to the unique communicative context of the Internet. For these reasons, both the first and the second version of the GPIUS have been used recently in a variety of contexts for the assessment of GPIU (e.g., Ang, Chong, Chye, & Huan, 2012;Casale & Fioravanti, 2011;Casale, Tella, & Fioravanti, 2013;Chittaro & Vianello, 2013;Fioravanti et al, 2012;Fioravanti, Primi, & Casale, 2013;Gámez-Guadix et al, 2012) with the aim of reporting the properties of the scale across various cultures. Among Mexican adolescents, the GPIUS2 has demonstrated adequate psychometric qualities, including construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency (Gámez-Guadix et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the Internet Addiction Test (IAT; Young, 1998), the most used instrument for assessing PIU, the GPIUS2 is specifically focused on problematic use that arises due to the unique communicative context of the Internet. For these reasons, both the first and the second version of the GPIUS have been used recently in a variety of contexts for the assessment of GPIU (e.g., Ang, Chong, Chye, & Huan, 2012;Casale & Fioravanti, 2011;Casale, Tella, & Fioravanti, 2013;Chittaro & Vianello, 2013;Fioravanti et al, 2012;Fioravanti, Primi, & Casale, 2013;Gámez-Guadix et al, 2012) with the aim of reporting the properties of the scale across various cultures. Among Mexican adolescents, the GPIUS2 has demonstrated adequate psychometric qualities, including construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency (Gámez-Guadix et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, these studies had only examined relationships or partial pathways between these variables and GPIU, with contradictory findings. For example, there were studies [10,11] that reported conflicting results with regards to the role of depression predicting PIU. These issues have led to questions regarding the applied value of Davis's original conceptualisation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies [3,[10][11][12][13] based on Davis's [1] model investigated only some related variables (e.g., depression) based on the original model and included some other variables (e.g., loneliness) that were not included in the original conceptualisation. Additionally, these studies had only examined relationships or partial pathways between these variables and GPIU, with contradictory findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What effect this constant online connectivity may have for young people's development is a highly complex issue with no simple answers. One important consequence of excessive chatting seems to be compulsive Internet use, which in turn is associated with depressive symptoms and loneliness (Caplan, 2003;Casale & Fioravanti, 2011;van der Aa et al, 2009). Thus, even though early adolescents may be constantly connected with others, it is not certain that they will be less lonely or feel better as a result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compulsive Internet use has been defined as experiences of discomfort when the Internet is unavailable, continued use of the Internet despite wanting to cut down or stop, using the Internet to avoid unpleasant feelings, allowing Internet use to dominate one's behaviors and cognitions, and resulting in conflicts with others or the self . Compulsive Internet use has been linked to various poor psychosocial outcomes such as depressive symptoms and loneliness (e.g., Caplan, 2003;Casale & Fioravanti, 2011;van der Aa et al, 2009). As such, it is a suitable framework when examining problematic use of the Internet without categorizing or diagnosing participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%