2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychophysiological responses to inspiratory resistive loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When caffeine was unexpectedly administered in bitter lemon and thus unexpectedly led to autonomic arousal and respiratory stimulation, startle response magnitudes were reduced in comparison to the expected administration in coffee. This finding of reduced startle response magnitude during stimulation of body sensations is in line with studies that reported attenuated startle eyeblink responses during a variety of interoceptive challenge tests including CO 2 inhalation and loaded breathing (Ceunen et al 2013;Pappens et al 2012;Pappens et al 2011). It has been suggested that this reduction of startle reflex magnitudes may be attributed to increased attention allocation to interoceptive sensations Pappens et al 2011).…”
Section: Expectancy Effects On Startle Response Modulation During a Csupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When caffeine was unexpectedly administered in bitter lemon and thus unexpectedly led to autonomic arousal and respiratory stimulation, startle response magnitudes were reduced in comparison to the expected administration in coffee. This finding of reduced startle response magnitude during stimulation of body sensations is in line with studies that reported attenuated startle eyeblink responses during a variety of interoceptive challenge tests including CO 2 inhalation and loaded breathing (Ceunen et al 2013;Pappens et al 2012;Pappens et al 2011). It has been suggested that this reduction of startle reflex magnitudes may be attributed to increased attention allocation to interoceptive sensations Pappens et al 2011).…”
Section: Expectancy Effects On Startle Response Modulation During a Csupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This finding of reduced startle response magnitude during stimulation of body sensations is in line with studies that reported attenuated startle eyeblink responses during a variety of interoceptive challenge tests including CO 2 inhalation and loaded breathing (Ceunen et al 2013;Pappens et al 2012;Pappens et al 2011). It has been suggested that this reduction of startle reflex magnitudes may be attributed to increased attention allocation to interoceptive sensations Pappens et al 2011). In accordance with this interpretation, Alius et al (2014) demonstrated that decreased startle reflex magnitudes during a dyspneic challenge were accompanied by reduced amplitudes of the P300 component of the probe-evoked potential as an index of reduced processing of auditory startle probes (Cuthbert et al 1998;Keil et al 2007;Schupp et al 1997;Schupp et al 1997).…”
Section: Expectancy Effects On Startle Response Modulation During a Csupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of directing attentional focus on an ongoing interoceptive event on startle modulation has never been investigated directly. The combined results of two recent studies (Pappens et al, 2010(Pappens et al, , 2011, however, support the plausibility of startle eyeblink decrease when attention is focused internally. Measuring eyeblink startle and electrodermal responses in healthy participants during resistive breathing, we found elevated skin conductance responses, but no potentiation of the eyeblink startle response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Measuring eyeblink startle and electrodermal responses in healthy participants during resistive breathing, we found elevated skin conductance responses, but no potentiation of the eyeblink startle response. A follow-up study in which attention was directed externally during the application of the breathing resistor did result in eyeblink startle potentiation (Pappens et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%