Psychophysiological responses to idiosyncratic stress in bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder

Hilbert, Anja; Vögele, Claus; Tuschen‐Caffier, Brunna; Hartmann, Andrea S.

doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.07.013

Cited by 62 publications

(80 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the groups did not differ in the magnitude of the increase in negative affect in response to the TSST. This result is in line with other reports [22,31,34,44,45,90] and suggests that while ED is associated with elevated negative mood, affective reactivity to psychosocial stress is preserved. Kaye [53] reviewed related literature and summarized that the dysregulation in mood is a consequence of an altered brain serotonin function in patients with AN and BN and indicates a neurobiological vulnerability.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…We expected differences in the HPAA stress response and the CAR between ED patients and HC and a lower SNS stress response and a stronger negative affect after the TSST in ED patients compared to HC. The latter prediction was based on a recent study showing that stress exposure resulted in stronger sadness responses as well as insecurity in ED patients compared to HC [45].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Blunted neuroendocrine stress reactivity in young women with eating disorders

Het

Vocks

Wolf

et al. 2015

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blunted neuroendocrine stress reactivity in young women with eating disorders

Het

Vocks

Wolf

et al. 2015

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In one such paradigm, obese BED participants in the stress condition demonstrated a stronger motivation to eat and a weaker satiety perception compared to those without BED and who were not in the stress condition, suggesting that BED is more affected by stress than is seen in weight-matched controls [187]. There is other evidence of increased cardiovascular activity, and a greater sadness and insecurity response to stress induction in BED participants compared to their controls [188]. …”

Section: A Dimensional View Of Overeatingmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Passive Overeating to “Food Addiction”: A Spectrum of Compulsion and Severity

Davis

2013

ISRN Obesity

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A psychobiological dimension of eating behaviour is proposed, which is anchored at the low end by energy intake that is relatively well matched to energy output and is reflected by a stable body mass index (BMI) in the healthy range. Further along the continuum are increasing degrees of overeating (and BMI) characterized by more severe and more compulsive ingestive behaviours. In light of the many similarities between chronic binge eating and drug abuse, several authorities have adopted the perspective that an apparent dependence on highly palatable food—accompanied by emotional and social distress—can be best conceptualized as an addiction disorder. Therefore, this review also considers the overlapping symptoms and characteristics of binge eating disorder (BED) and models of food addiction, both in preclinical animal studies and in human research. It also presents this work in the context of the modern and “toxic” food environment and therein the ubiquitous triggers for over-consumption. We complete the review by providing evidence that what we have come to call “food addiction” may simply be a more acute and pathologically dense form of BED.

show abstract

“…In clinical studies of ED outcomes, pre‐treatment interpersonal problems predict poorer treatment response and higher dropout (Jones et al, ). In addition, interpersonal stressors are common binge triggers (Hilbert, Vogele, Tuschen‐Caffier, & Hartmann, ). Notably, such stressors frequently occur in women with BED, as they report lower marital satisfaction, less frequent positive interaction, and increased negative interaction in their relationships than non‐ill women (Whisman, Demetyeva, Baucom, & Bulik, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%