Psychophysiological Responses to Group Exercise Training Sessions: Does Exercise Intensity Matter?

Vandoni, Matteo; Codrons, Erwan; Marin, Luca; Correale, Luca; Bigliassi, Marcelo; Buzzachera, Cosme Franklim

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149997

Cited by 15 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, drop‐out rate for physical activity treatment in patients with depression is usually quite high, around 30% . Reasons for dropping‐out are usually connected to lack of time or unpleasant feelings connected with high imposed intensity exercise . According to the ACSM guidelines, all studies having aerobic exercise as the active treatment used vigorous intensity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression

Brondino

Rocchetti

Fusar-Poli

et al. 2017

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression

Brondino

Rocchetti

Fusar-Poli

et al. 2017

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a counterbalanced manner, 6–20 Borg RPE and FS scales were administered at the end of each 2-min stage of the maximal incremental exercise test. Participants rated “how” and “what” they felt at these moments ( DaSilva et al, 2011 ; Vandoni et al, 2016 ). Standard definitions of perceived exertion and affective valence, along with separate instructional sets for the 6–20 Borg RPE and FS scales, were read to the participants before the tests ( Ekkekakis et al, 2005 ; Noble and Robertson, 1996 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Psychophysiological Responses to Maximal Incremental Exercise Test in Recreational Endurance Runners

Baldari

Buzzachera²,

Vitor-Costa

et al. 2018

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous studies have suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) might improve exercise performance and alter psychophysiological responses to exercise. However, it is presently unknown whether this simple technique has similar (or greater) effects on running performance. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to test the hypothesis that, compared with sham and cathodal tDCS, anodal tDCS applied over the M1 region would attenuate perception of effort, improve affective valence, and enhance exercise tolerance, regardless of changes in physiological responses, during maximal incremental exercise. In a double-blind, randomized, counterbalanced design, 13 healthy recreational endurance runners, aged 20–42 years, volunteered to participate in this study. On three separate occasions, the subjects performed an incremental ramp exercise test from rest to volitional exhaustion on a motor-driven treadmill following 20-min of brain stimulation with either placebo tDCS (sham) or real tDCS (cathodal and anodal). Breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange and ventilation and indices of muscle hemodynamics and oxygenation were collected continuously during the ramp exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and affective valence in response to the ramp exercise test were also measured. Compared with sham, neither anodal tDCS nor cathodal tDCS altered the physiological responses to exercise (P > 0.05). Similarly, RPE and affective responses during the incremental ramp exercise test did not differ between the three experimental conditions at any time (P > 0.05). The exercise tolerance was also not significantly different following brain stimulation with either sham (533 ± 46 s) or real tDCS (anodal tDCS: 530 ± 44 s, and cathodal tDCS: 537 ± 40 s; P > 0.05). These results demonstrate that acute tDCS applied over the M1 region did not alter physiological responses, perceived exertion, affective valence, or exercise performance in recreational endurance runners.

show abstract

“…First, confidence to participate in PA might be influenced by co-morbidity where exercise-induced physical symptoms are misinterpreted as health threats, causing fear and distress that can decrease self-efficacy [ 32 ]. Second, our pre-assessment informed the EOD dose that deliberately worked patients at a moderate intensity to minimize high-intensity unpleasantness [ 33 ] and was also designed to convey a positive knowledge about exercising. While knowledge acquisition is a necessary factor in changing behaviour, it is not usually sufficient by itself and influences to change health behaviour must usually come from sources in addition to, or instead of, factual knowledge, including behavioural modification interventions [ 34 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Captivating a captive audience: a quality improvement project increasing participation in intradialytic exercise across five renal dialysis units

Abdulnassir

Egas-Kitchener

Whibley

et al. 2017

Clinical Kidney Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundBenefits of exercise on dialysis (EOD) are well established, however, uptake in our local satellite haemodialysis units is low. The implications of the status quo are risks to treatment efficiency, equity and patient centredness in managing personal health risks. The current study aimed to identify and address barriers to exercise participation while on dialysis by substantiating local EOD risks, assigning context, implementing changes and evaluating their impact. Our primary objective was to increase the uptake of EOD across our five dialysis units.MethodsSemi-structured interview and questionnaire data from patients and nursing staff were used to inform a root-cause analysis of barriers to exercise participation while on dialysis. Intervention was subsequently designed and implemented by a senior physiotherapist. It consisted of patient and nursing staff education, equipment modification and introduction of patient motivation schemes.ResultsStaff knowledge, patient motivation and equipment problems were the main barriers to EOD. A significant increase in the uptake of EOD from 23.3% pre-intervention to 74.3% post-intervention was achieved [χ2 (1, N = 174) = 44.18, P < 0.001].ConclusionsBarriers to EOD are challenging, but there is evidence that patients wish to participate and would benefit from doing so. The input of a physiotherapist in the dialysis units had a significant positive effect on the uptake of EOD. National guidelines should encourage dialysis units to include professional exercise provision in future service planning.

show abstract

Psychophysiological Responses to Group Exercise Training Sessions: Does Exercise Intensity Matter?

Cited by 15 publications

References 32 publications

A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression

A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Psychophysiological Responses to Maximal Incremental Exercise Test in Recreational Endurance Runners

Captivating a captive audience: a quality improvement project increasing participation in intradialytic exercise across five renal dialysis units

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About