Psychophysiologic Reactivity as a Dimension of Individual Differences

Manuck, Stephen B.; Kasprowicz, Alfred L.; Monroe, Scott M.; Larkin, Kevin T.; Kaplan, Jay R.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0906-0_23

Cited by 115 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Manuk et al 5) reported that differences in cardiovascular reactivity to stress can be reliably detected using experimental methods and that persons at risk for stressrelated disorders can be identified from their exaggerated cardiovascular response profiles. A variety of experimental models of mental stress have been proposed and employed in the laboratory to examine the physiological responses caused by mental stress.…”

Section: Circulatory and Central Nervous System Responses To Differenmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been hypothesized that persons at risk for stress-related circulatory disorders can be identified from their chronic exaggerated blood pressure response and their underlying hemodynamic to the increased blood pressure 5) . Rose et al 6) reported that circulatory reactivity to work-related mental stress, especially an increase in systolic blood pressure, may be a longterm predictor of incident hypertension.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Circulatory and Central Nervous System Responses to Different Types of Mental Stress

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study was to compare the physiological responses to different types of mental stress encountered in the workplace. Circulatory and central nervous system responses were examined in 8 healthy males by exposing them to 20-min of white noise (80 dB(A)) and 20-min of computer-based mental arithmetic tasks as models of vascular and cardiac stress, respectively. The results indicated that both cardiac and vascular stresses increased blood pressure and showed a cumulative effect as exposure period was extended. Heart rate and prefrontal oxygenated hemoglobin levels (measured by NIRS) increased in the face of cardiac stress but were not clearly altered by vascular stress and indicated that cardiac stress higher cardiac response and requires more oxygen supply to the brain. As the central nervous system responded, an event-related potential P300 component was elicited by an auditory oddball task presented before and after each stress. The P300 amplitude increased for both stresses. However, P300 latency increased in response to cardiac stress but decreased with vascular stress in the left prefrontal. Thus, the circulatory and central nervous system responses to cardiac stress and to vascular stress may have different underlying mechanisms, and measuring physiological indices appears to be an effective method by which to evaluate the influence of mental stress.

show abstract

Section: Circulatory and Central Nervous System Responses To Differenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Circulatory and Central Nervous System Responses to Different Types of Mental Stress

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This model conforms to classical notions of experimental control, and promotes values such as task homogeneity, internal consistency, and testretest reliability to attain conventional standards of psychometric reliability (Kamarck, 1992;Manuck, Kasprowicz , Monroe, Larkin, & Kaplan, 1989). The use of homogeneous tasks is predicated on sympathetic hyperresponsivity being the key process in linking reactivity with CV disease, a commonly held view (Rozanski, Blumenthal, & Kaplan, 1999).…”

Section: The S-r Approach To Reactivitymentioning

confidence: 67%

“…A related concern is the assumption of a stationary CV baseline that is requisite to the recurrent activation version of the S-R reactivity model (Edwards & Hill, 1967;Jennings et al, 1998). Consistent with a homeostatic view of reactivity as deviation from steady state, this model is predicated on linking chronic large changes in CV levels from baseline (rest) to stress with disease (Manuck et al, 1989). However, the notion of a static biological equilibrium is belied by findings that healthy cardiac dynamics are often marked by high variability, low predictability, and nonequilibrium in "baseline" states (Friedman & Thayer, 1998a;Friedman & Thayer, 1998b;Goldberger, 1991;Kaplan et al, 1991;Lipsitz & Goldberger, 1992;Peng et al, 1994).…”

Section: An Idiodynamic View Of CV Activitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Idiodynamic profiles of cardiovascular activity: A P-technique approach

Friedman

Santucci

2003

Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study was conducted to expand the conventional view of cardiovascular (CV) reactivity by using the idiodynamic paradigm for investigation of individuals. Patterns of autonomic CV regulation were assessed in six subjects across diverse laboratory tasks on three separate occasions. Individual CV profiles were derived from these data with P-technique factor analysis, and then group aggregated with chain P-technique. The composite pattern suggested a three-component solution consisting of cardiac rate, cardiac contractility, and peripheral resistance factors. Individual profiles were compared to the composite pattern; these profiles differed in the number of components derived, percentage variance explained by these components, and relative dominance of specific CV components. A hypothesis that emerged is that the subjects differed in the complexity of CV control. It appears that the idiodynamic framework, combined with novel research designs and statistical methods, may help expand the view of CV reactivity beyond the traditional unitary view as response magnitude.

show abstract

“…During the stressors, blood pressure and heart rate measures were quantified as mean scores for each of the stressors that were residualized for baseline based on previously described procedures (Manuck, Kasprowicz, Monroe, Larkin, & Kaplan, 1989). To reduce measurement error, Kamarck et al's procedures to increase test-retest reliability were implemented (1992).…”

Section: Responses To Mental Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hostility and anger expression behavioral and cardiovascular responses to mental stress among cardiovascular disease patients

Tucker¹

2002

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychophysiologic Reactivity as a Dimension of Individual Differences

Cited by 115 publications

References 21 publications

Circulatory and Central Nervous System Responses to Different Types of Mental Stress

Circulatory and Central Nervous System Responses to Different Types of Mental Stress

Idiodynamic profiles of cardiovascular activity: A P-technique approach

Hostility and anger expression behavioral and cardiovascular responses to mental stress among cardiovascular disease patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About