2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychophysical contrast calibration

Abstract: Electronic displays and computer systems offer numerous advantages for clinical vision testing. Laboratory and clinical measurements of various functions and in particular of (letter) contrast sensitivity require accurately calibrated display contrast. In the laboratory this is achieved using expensive light meters. We developed and evaluated a novel method that uses only psychophysical responses of a person with normal vision to calibrate the luminance contrast of displays for experimental and clinical applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To eliminate the need of physical measure of pixel value-luminance relations with a (rather expensive) light meter, the psychophysical method of contrast calibration [14] will be implemented, so that the contrast of stimuli can be correctly set for a given display.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To eliminate the need of physical measure of pixel value-luminance relations with a (rather expensive) light meter, the psychophysical method of contrast calibration [14] will be implemented, so that the contrast of stimuli can be correctly set for a given display.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bit-stealing technique has been previously used to achieve the higher dynamic range needed to display the contrast levels needed for human threshold measurements [14]. …”
Section: Implementing Cs Measuring Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18 Contrast sensitivity was assessed at a 0.45 m testing distance using a custom computerized program, equivalent to the Pelli-Robson chart, for letters subtending 2.5°visual angle presented on a luminance-calibrated display. 19 Visual fields were assessed with kinetic perimetry using a computerized central visual fields program 20 at a 1 m test distance with a white square stimulus (0.7° visual angle) and a white fixation cross (0.7° visual angle) presented against a black background. Participants were encouraged to keep the fixation cross as clear as possible during the test ( i.e ., to use the preferred retinal locus for fixation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%