2013
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychopathy's influence on the coupling between hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal and ‐gonadal axes among incarcerated adolescents

Abstract: Conduct disorder (CD) is a heterogeneous diagnosis, leading researchers to initiate research into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this disorder. One specifier of CD currently considered for inclusion in the DSM-V is callous-unemotional (CU) traits. CU traits are thought to have neuroendocrine underpinnings, yet little is known about Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) and –Gonadal (HPG) hormones in the context of psychopathic traits. The current study sought to identify daily coupling patterns betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While different situations can result in different levels of coordinated activation of cortisol and testosterone responses, the same situation may be perceived as a bigger threat to one's social status by some individuals, resulting in coordinated activation of top-down processes in the brain leading to a coordinated cortisol-testosterone response . Thus, keeping the situation constant, individual differences such as low dominance, high anxiety, and high negative affectivity may all predict stronger coupling, which is in line with previous findings that adolescents who are less callous and have more life adversity-and veterans with more traumatic military experiences-show stronger cortisol-testosterone coupling Johnson et al, 2014). It may be that individuals who have developed a sensitivity to social threats developed mechanisms to produce a coordinated response to such threats, activating and deactivating both axes in concert according to perceived changes in threat levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While different situations can result in different levels of coordinated activation of cortisol and testosterone responses, the same situation may be perceived as a bigger threat to one's social status by some individuals, resulting in coordinated activation of top-down processes in the brain leading to a coordinated cortisol-testosterone response . Thus, keeping the situation constant, individual differences such as low dominance, high anxiety, and high negative affectivity may all predict stronger coupling, which is in line with previous findings that adolescents who are less callous and have more life adversity-and veterans with more traumatic military experiences-show stronger cortisol-testosterone coupling Johnson et al, 2014). It may be that individuals who have developed a sensitivity to social threats developed mechanisms to produce a coordinated response to such threats, activating and deactivating both axes in concert according to perceived changes in threat levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It would be even more informative, however, to examine the degree of coordination among multiple hormones. Studies examining within-adolescent associations between cortisol and testosterone responses reported positive coupling for adolescents (Marceau et al, 2013;Dismukes et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2014;Marceau et al, 2014). The present findings suggest that during the different phases of a social-evaluative situation, cortisol and testosterone also show coordinated activation in adult men, in pre/early pubertal boys, and in pre/early pubertal girls, suggesting that coupling is not specific to adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Behavioral and neurobiological data suggest that in some cases individuals with psychopathic traits can perform particularly well in representing and understanding others' intentions, emotions, and desires (i.e., theory of mind) [Bird and Viding, 2014; Johnson et al, 2014; Jones et al, 2010; O'nions et al, 2014; Sebastian et al, 2012], and this apparently may aid their alleged “social predatorism” [Book et al, 2007; Dolan and Fullam, 2004; Nentjes et al, 2015; Sandvik et al, 2014; Wheeler et al, 2009]. However, our finding could also reflect excessive bottom‐up signaling of motivational salience, which may impair distinguishing one's egocentric desires and values from those of others, and shape a potentially self‐centered/narcissistic profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%