1991
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<828::aid-cncr2820671413>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychoneuroimmunology. Implications for oncology?

Abstract: Accumulating evidence indicates that the central nervous system (CNS) may regulate the activity of the immune system. Although the overall significance of the immune system in cancer remains controversial, psychosocial influences on immune function could potentially provide a mechanism to account for some of the reports of an association between psychosocial factors and cancer prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a higher rate of complications, which is a more objective variable, may be explained by 2 possible mechanisms. One is the direct effect of stress hormones observed in the anxious patients (12). The other is the immunosuppressive effect of psychological status (7,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of a higher rate of complications, which is a more objective variable, may be explained by 2 possible mechanisms. One is the direct effect of stress hormones observed in the anxious patients (12). The other is the immunosuppressive effect of psychological status (7,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One is the direct effect of stress hormones observed in the anxious patients (12). The other is the immunosuppressive effect of psychological status (7,12). Unfortunately, we did not measure any of the stress hormones and immune parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These changes may be accompanied or followed by poor compliance to medical regimens, increases in negative health behaviors and decreases in positive health behaviors, which may combine with physiologic responses to stress to encourage local and metastatic disease progression. A major challenge in psychosocial intervention research in oncology is finding ways to minimize and account for the confounding effects of different disease characteristics and cancer treatments on biobehavioral indicators and clinical outcomes (Bovjberg, 1991; van der Pompe, Antoni & Heijnen, 1998). Using the example of breast cancer, differences in clinicopathological characteristics can have prognostic significance (stage, HER2-neu+/−, ER/PR+/−) (Biganzoli & Boracchi, 2004; Woodward, Storm, Tucker, McNeese, 2003), and in at least one trial, were found to moderate the effects of a psychological intervention on clinical outcomes (Spiegel et al, 2007).…”
Section: Psychosocial Intervention Effects On Psychological Adapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, psychological or behavioral factors and stress can influence many physiological and pathological disease outcomes including cancer (Andersen et al 1994, Andersen et al 1998Bovbjerg 1991;Levy et al 1985Levy et al , 1987Spiegel and Kato 1996), as carefully examined for the last three decades. Research over the past 30 years in the field of psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) and multiple clinical and epidemiological studies have given much contribution to the understanding of the effect of psychological stress on human diseases, with particular emphasis on cancer related to suppressed immune responses to tumors and stress-induced alterations in the tumor microenvironment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%