Oxford Handbooks Online 2013
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199796304.013.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Versus Actuarial Interpretation of Intelligence and Related Aptitude Batteries

Abstract: Interpretation of intelligence tests involves making various inferences about the individual based on their performance. Because there are many different scores within intelligence tests reflecting different levels (Full Scale, factors, subtests) and there are many different comparisons provided in test manuals and the extant literature, there is a multitude of possible inferences. This chapter is concerned with reviewing the various available scores and comparisons with suggested interpretations and a review … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
5
75
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The VIQ-PIQ discrepancies of the latter study were also not related to outcomes on the CBCL scales. Furthermore, the present results correspond to the findings of Canivez [35]. He performed additional VIQ-PIQ analyses on a study relating outcomes of the WISC-III and the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents [36] to academic achievement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The VIQ-PIQ discrepancies of the latter study were also not related to outcomes on the CBCL scales. Furthermore, the present results correspond to the findings of Canivez [35]. He performed additional VIQ-PIQ analyses on a study relating outcomes of the WISC-III and the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents [36] to academic achievement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…He stressed the importance of investigating the consequences of specific cognitive deficits in terms of impairment in daily life regardless of specific psychiatric disorders. Taken together, the results of the above studies [18,35] as well as our own research do not support the belief that a specific pattern of cognitive performance is associated with more or fewer psychosocial problems.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such results suggest that global scores can be useful indexes for clinical neuropsychologists to interpret, even though such scores mask the interpretation of the multiple individual characteristics (processes) that are more truly reflective of an individual's cognitive functioning. Further, findings of this study support Canivez's (2013) argument that global scores are valid and reliable when it comes to the interpretation of an individual's cognitive capacity. He supports his argument statistically, stating that global IQs have been found to have the strongest internal consistency, short-and longterm temporal stability, and predictive validity coefficients; they produce less error variance and account for the largest portion of the variance with a variety of criteria.…”
Section: Clinical Implications For Neuropsychologistssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Nevertheless, structural validity is necessary but not singularly sufficient for establishing construct validity. As a consequence, additional examinations of concurrent and predictive relationships with external measures are also important elements of scale validation (Canivez, 2013b;Cronbach & Meehl, 1955). According to Schneider, Mayer, and Newman (2016) it is not enough that a factor analysis supports the existence of a latent dimension, that factor should also "predict something that matters, above and beyond the other facets of intelligence" (p. 12).…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%