Psychometric Validation of Hindi Version of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22

Thakur, Pooja; Gupta, Vipan; Nanda, Manpreet Singh; Bhatia, Shenny

doi:10.1007/s12070-021-02808-1

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The SNOT-22 has been validated for CRS and allergic rhinitis but no other conditions (28,32) . It has also been translated and cross-culturally adapted to at least 20 languages (28,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51) . While the SNOT-22 has been well-validated in adults, it has been used in children and adolescents without formal validation in those age groups (52,53) .…”

Section: Disease-specific Quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Sedaghat,

Campbell,

Douglas

et al. 2024

Rhin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: With the recent proliferation of novel therapeutics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), there is an immediate need for comprehensive means to assess CRSwNP disease status as well as to determine treatment efficacy. Outcome measures exist in different forms. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) allow patients to provide direct input about their condition that is not possible to obtain in any other way. Common constructs that are measured using PROMs include quality of life or the burden of disease manifestations (e.g., symptom severity). Outcomes may also include the results of objective diagnostic testing/measurement of clinical signs or measured using psychophysical tests. Biomarkers represent an emerging class of outcome measures for CRSwNP and are chosen to directly reflect the active pathophysiologic processes of CRSwNP in the peripheral blood, sinus/polyp tissues, and sinonasal mucus. Methods: Narrative review of the literature, identifying and describing outcome measures that may be used in the evaluation of CRSwNP and for assessment of treatment responses. Results: In this review, we identify many different outcome measures for CRSwNP that fall under the categories of PROM, objective test, psychophysical test or biomarker. We describe the history of each - including seminal studies - and demonstrate the formal validation, psychometric performance, and limitations of each. Conclusions: PROMs, objective tests, psychophysical tests and biomarkers represent different classes of outcome measures that are complementary means of assessing CRSwNP disease status and treatment efficacy. The choice or interpretation of a CRSwNP outcome measure should be undertaken with full knowledge of its formal validation, psychometric performance, and limitations.

show abstract

Section: Disease-specific Quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Sedaghat,

Campbell,

Douglas

et al. 2024

Rhin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The higher the total score, the more serious the impact of the disease on the quality of life of patients. Previous studies (Behnke et al, 2023;Simmonds et al, 2022;Thakur et al, 2022) have proven that the SNOT-22 questionnaire is comprehensive, and researchers can evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of patients before and after surgical intervention from three dimensions: physiological problems (item 1-12), sleep function symptoms (item 13-16) and psychological and emotional outcome (item 17-22). The total reliability is good, and the Cronbach's α coefficient is .923.…”

Section: Outcomes Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nasal Irrigation Improves the Nasal Related Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma

Mu,

Ni,

2023

Biological Research For Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: After transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection patients have reduced olfactory function and quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of nasal irrigation on the nasal related quality of life in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection. Methods: Patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas in a tertiary hospital in China were included. The patients were randomly divided into a control group and nasal irrigation group according to the random sequence generated by the SPSS22.0 software. The 22-item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) was used to evaluate nasal related quality of life; lower SNOT-22 scores indicate a higher quality of life. The Toyota and Takagi (T&T) olfactometer test was used to evaluate the olfactory function of patients. Results: A total of 82 patients were finally included. The SNOT-22 scores of both groups after surgery were significantly higher than those before surgery ( p < .05). The total SNOT-22 score of nasal irrigation group at one month (23.45 ± 3.72 vs. 27.48 ± 4.07) and three months (15.83 ± 2.86 vs. 21.82 ± 3.36) after surgery was lower than that in the control group ( p < .05). There was no significant difference in olfactory function between the two groups at one month and three months after surgery ( p > .05). The nasal mucosal score in the nasal irrigation group was significantly improved compared with the control group at one month and three months after surgery ( p < .05). Conclusion: Nasal irrigation is associated with improved quality of life in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection compared with the control group.

show abstract

Psychometric Validation of Hindi Version of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22

Cited by 2 publications

References 32 publications

Outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Nasal Irrigation Improves the Nasal Related Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About