2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric validation of a Patient-Centred Quality of Cancer Care Questionnaire in Mexico

Abstract: ObjectivesTo develop and validate a Patient-Centred Quality of Cancer Care Questionnaire in Spanish (PCQCCQ-S) appropriate to the Mexican context.DesignPsychometric validation of a questionnaire.SettingTwo public oncology hospitals in Mexico City.Participants1809 patients with cancer aged ≥18 years.Source of informationCross-sectional survey.MethodsThe validation procedures comprised (1) content validity through a group of experts and patients; (2) item reduction and evaluation of the factor structure, through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a patient-centered quality of cancer care questionnaire previously validated in Mexico to evaluate experiences with health care [ 27 ]. This questionnaire has 30 items in five domains: 1) timely care; 2) clear information; 3) information for treatment decision-making; 4) care to address biopsychosocial needs; and 5) respectful and coordinated care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a patient-centered quality of cancer care questionnaire previously validated in Mexico to evaluate experiences with health care [ 27 ]. This questionnaire has 30 items in five domains: 1) timely care; 2) clear information; 3) information for treatment decision-making; 4) care to address biopsychosocial needs; and 5) respectful and coordinated care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item has a 4-point Likert response option (1 = totally agree, 2 = agree, 3 = disagree, and 4 = totally disagree with the statement about one’s experience in a specific health care encounter). The score for each domain was calculated by reversing the response options, adding all subscale items, and dividing them by the number of items in each subscale/domain for a minimum score of one and a maximum of four per domain [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a patient-centered quality of cancer care questionnaire previously validated in Mexico to evaluate experiences with health care [27]. This questionnaire has 30 items in ve domains: 1) timely care; 2) clear information; 3) information for treatment decision-making; 4) care to address biopsychosocial needs; and 5) respectful and coordinated care.…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item has a 4-point Likert response option (1=totally agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, and 4=totally disagree with the statement about one's experience in a speci c health care encounter). The score for each domain was calculated by reversing the response options, adding all subscale items, and dividing them by the number of items in each subscale/domain for a minimum score of one and a maximum of four per domain [27].…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a patient-centered quality of cancer care (PCQoCC) questionnaire previously validated in Mexico to evaluate experiences with health care [25]. This questionnaire has 30 items in ve domains: 1) timely care; 2) clarity of information; 3) information for treatment decision-making; 4) care to address biopsychosocial needs; and 5) respectful and coordinated care.…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%