1996
DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0302_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric qualities of the rand 36-item health survey 1.0: A multidimensional measure of general health status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
230
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 449 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
230
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-rated health was assessed by the validated Dutch version of the SF-36 general health scale [19][20][21]. The scale consists of five items, each scored on a five-point response format (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Measuring Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-rated health was assessed by the validated Dutch version of the SF-36 general health scale [19][20][21]. The scale consists of five items, each scored on a five-point response format (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Measuring Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived general health was assessed by one item of the RAND-36 Short-form Health Status Survey (Ware and Sherbourne 1992; Dutch validated version of van der Zee et al 1996). This item is: 'In general, would you say your health is 
?…”
Section: Perceived Health Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was the impact of psoriasis on daily life, measured on three domains, for which total scores were computed (composite scores: the overall average of normalized (z-)scores of the questionnaires included in each domain): (1) psychological functioning, consisting of negative mood (ISDL) [40], anxiety (ISDL) [40], and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) [46,47]; (2) physical functioning, consisting of itch (ISDL) [40] and fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength) [48]; and (3) impact on daily activities, consisting of role limitations due to physical health problems and role limitations due to emotional problems (RAND-36 Health Status Inventory) [49,50]. Secondary outcomes consisted of clinician-rated (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI) [51] and self-reported disease severity (self-administered PASI) [52], and dermatological treatment compliance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%