2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-009-9141-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of Three New National Survey of Student Engagement Based Engagement Scales: An Item Response Theory Analysis

Abstract: We sought to develop and psychometrically describe three new student engagement scales to measure college students' engagement with their faculty (studentfaculty engagement: SFE), community-based activities (CBA), and transformational learning opportunities (TLO) using items selected from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), a widely used, standardized student engagement survey. We used confirmatory factor analysis for ordered-categorical measures, item response theory (IRT), and data from 941 US … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many educators and government-and industry-sponsored consortia have questioned whether U.S. higher education is adequately preparing students to meet twenty-first century challenges (Bennis and O'Toole 2005;NLCLEAP 2007;Department of Education 2006;Education Consortium 2006;Ghoshal 2005;Kutner et al 2007). Higher education institutions are re-examining their educational practices and seeking to demonstrate that they are indeed providing students with the knowledge and skills required to survive and thrive in society (Carle et al 2009;Education Consortium 2006;Klein et al 2005). They have proposed a variety of strategies to improve student learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many educators and government-and industry-sponsored consortia have questioned whether U.S. higher education is adequately preparing students to meet twenty-first century challenges (Bennis and O'Toole 2005;NLCLEAP 2007;Department of Education 2006;Education Consortium 2006;Ghoshal 2005;Kutner et al 2007). Higher education institutions are re-examining their educational practices and seeking to demonstrate that they are indeed providing students with the knowledge and skills required to survive and thrive in society (Carle et al 2009;Education Consortium 2006;Klein et al 2005). They have proposed a variety of strategies to improve student learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freshman Survey (Astin 1993b), and student and alumni surveys developed by the University of North Carolina System (Carle, Jaffee, Vaughan, & Eder, 2009;Kuh, 2001;Kuh, Pace, & Vesper;.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three recent studies have focused on the structural component of self-report data (Carle, Jaffee, Vaughan, and Eder, 2009;Gordon, Ludlum, and Hoey, 2008;LaNasa, Cabrera, and Trangsrud, 2009). Although these studies examined the NSSE benchmarks rather than self-reports of learning outcomes, they do point out two challenges associated with efforts to evaluate the structural component of construct validity.…”
Section: Previous Evidence Regarding the Validity Of Self-reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VALIDITY AND LIMITATIONS OF COLLEGE STUDENT SELF-REPORT DATA (Carle, Jaffee, Vaughan, and Eder, 2009;Pascarella, Seifert, and Blaich, 2010). My own research has generally supported the appropriateness of using self-reports in higher education research and assessment, with some reservations (Pike, 1995(Pike, , 1996(Pike, , 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%