2017
DOI: 10.1017/s1352465817000455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Worry Behaviors Inventory: Replication and Extension in a Large Clinical and Community Sample

Abstract: The WBI provides clinicians and researchers with a brief, clinically meaningful index of problematic behaviors that may guide treatment decisions and contribute to our understanding of maintaining factors in GAD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study undertook an IRT analysis of the WBI and provides important additional information about the quality and reliability of the WBI items. As predicted, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the WBI supported the twofactor structure found in previous studies (Mahoney et al, 2016(Mahoney et al, , 2018. Indeed, the two-factor structure provided a closer fit to the current data than previous data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current study undertook an IRT analysis of the WBI and provides important additional information about the quality and reliability of the WBI items. As predicted, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the WBI supported the twofactor structure found in previous studies (Mahoney et al, 2016(Mahoney et al, , 2018. Indeed, the two-factor structure provided a closer fit to the current data than previous data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Evidence of internal consistency (total α = .86, Safety Behaviors subscale α = .85, Avoidance subscale α = .75), temporal stability (total r = .89, Safety Behaviors subscale r = .89, Avoidance subscale r = .74 over 2-4 weeks) and validity (e.g. convergent/divergent, discriminant, and incremental validity) has been provided (Mahoney et al, 2016(Mahoney et al, , 2018. Internal consistency in the current sample was total α = .86, Safety Behaviors subscale α = .85, Avoidance subscale α = .74.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limited amount of study in this area may in part relate to the lack of a validated measure of maladaptive behaviours associated with GAD. Such a measure has recently been developed and evaluated in treatment-seeking samples (the Worry Behaviours Inventory; Mahoney et al, 2016Mahoney et al, , 2018a). In the current sample, we found that the two-factor structure of the WBI was confirmed, with both factors demonstrating satisfactory internal stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that two factors explain the co-occurrence of these maladaptive behaviours: Safety Behaviours and Avoidance. Evidence of internal consistency (total α = .86; Safety Behaviours subscale α = .85; Avoidance subscale α = .75), temporal stability (total r = .89; Safety Behaviours subscale r = .89; Avoidance subscale r = .74 over 2-4 weeks) and validity (e.g., convergent/divergent, discriminant, and incremental validity) has been demonstrated in treatment-seeking samples (Mahoney et al, 2016(Mahoney et al, , 2018a. Current internal consistency is reported below.…”
Section: Measures Worry Behaviours Inventory (Wbi)mentioning
confidence: 99%