2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, trauma has been one of the most important causes of disability and mortality worldwide [ 1 - 3 ]. This problem can be caused by several factors, the most important of which are motorcycle accidents, car accidents and falling down.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, trauma has been one of the most important causes of disability and mortality worldwide [ 1 - 3 ]. This problem can be caused by several factors, the most important of which are motorcycle accidents, car accidents and falling down.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WHODAS II is a valid and reliable tool among Iranian trauma patients, 27 and assesses disability in six domains of understanding and participation, getting around, self-care, getting along with others, life activities, and participation in society. It consists of twelve items which are scored on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (No disability) to five (Severe disability).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research examining the psychometric properties of the 12‐item WHODAS 2.0 has been conducted in primary care patients with a first major depressive episode (Luciano et al, , ), patients with myocardial infarction (Kirchberger, Braitmayer, Coenen, Oberhauser, & Meisinger, ), neurosurgical patients (Schiavolin et al, ), trauma patients (Abedzadeh‐Kalahroudi, Razi, Sehat, & Asadi‐Lari, ), patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (Saltychev et al, ), and older adults from low‐ and middle‐income countries (Sousa et al, ). This research has demonstrated high internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and no bias in the way participants respond to items based on gender, age, education, marital status, presence of comorbidities, overall health status, and smoking status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%