2021
DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2021.2000013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Internalized sexual stigma scale for research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this study was guided by two internationally recognized frameworks for examining the pathways between minority stress and depression among SGM populations. Next, well‐validated psychometric measurements consistent with the frameworks were translated using established methods (Kittiteerasack, Matthews, et al, 2020; Kittiteerasack, Steffen, et al, 2020; Kittiteerasack, Matthews, & Park, et al, 2021; Kittiteerasack, Matthews, Steffen, et al, 2021) and used to measure key minority stress constructs. Finally, a range of recruitment and data collection strategies resulted in a large sample of SGM participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, this study was guided by two internationally recognized frameworks for examining the pathways between minority stress and depression among SGM populations. Next, well‐validated psychometric measurements consistent with the frameworks were translated using established methods (Kittiteerasack, Matthews, et al, 2020; Kittiteerasack, Steffen, et al, 2020; Kittiteerasack, Matthews, & Park, et al, 2021; Kittiteerasack, Matthews, Steffen, et al, 2021) and used to measure key minority stress constructs. Finally, a range of recruitment and data collection strategies resulted in a large sample of SGM participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores were calculated by adding all item scores and dividing that number by 5 to get the average. The range was from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more internalized sexual stigma (Kittiteerasack, Matthews, & Park, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation