Psychometric properties of the Session Rating Scale 3.0 in a Spanish clinical sample

Moggia, Danilo; Niño-Robles, Noelia; Miller, Scott D.; Feixas, Guillem

doi:10.1080/03069885.2020.1778635

Cited by 10 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further, the temporal stability of the SRS scores was adequate; the median of the stability coefficients of the Spanish version of the SRS was similar to the overall test-retest reliability of the American version (see Table 4), and the stability coefficient between the first and second psychotherapy sessions was the same as that found by the authors of the American SRS (Duncan et al, 2003). Lastly, it is worth mention that the reliability values obtained by the Spanish ORS and SRS are similar to values found in the Slovak translations (Biescad and Timulak, 2014), Dutch (Hafkenscheid et al, 2010;Janse et al, 2014), and those found in the Spanish translations conducted by the team of the original American authors (Moggia et al, 2018(Moggia et al, , 2020.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

“…Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the measures have been assessed for Dutch and Slovak translations (Hafkenscheid et al, 2010;Biescad and Timulak, 2014;Janse et al, 2014). They have also been assessed for two Spanish translations without contrasting if these translations apply to Peninsula Spanish speakers (Moggia et al, 2018(Moggia et al, , 2020.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Spanish Versions of the Outcome Rating Scale and the Session Rating Scale: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) uses standardized measures to both track and inform mental health service delivery. Use of ROM has been shown to improve the outcome of psychotherapy when applied to different types of patients. The present research was designed to determine the reliability and validity of the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and the Session Rating Scale (SRS) in a sample of Spanish patients. After a controlled process of translation into the Spanish that is spoken and written in Spain (i.e., in Europe, as distinct from, e.g., Latin American Spanish), both measures were completed by patients of an outpatient mental health unit during eight sessions of psychotherapy. Sixty mental health patients filled out the ORS and 59 the SRS. In addition, the ORS was completed by 33 people who constituted the non-clinical sample. The cut-off of the ORS was 24.52 points, and the Reliable Change Index (RCI) was 9.15 points. ORS and SRS scores exhibited excellent internal consistency. The temporal stability of the SRS was adequate. The convergent and discriminant validity of the two measures were adequate. Regarding the factorial validity of the ORS and the SRS, in the third psychotherapy session, confirmatory factor analyses evidenced the existence of a unifactorial model. The predictive validity of SRS was acceptable. The ORS was sensitive to changes in patients’ symptoms. In conclusion, compared to the original English versions of the ORS and SRS measures, the Spanish versions of the measures are also reliable and valid.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spanish Versions of the Outcome Rating Scale and the Session Rating Scale: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the NCCS, the four items solution rendered the same index as in the Clinical population (TCS; α = 0.83), slightly increased with the deletion of item b to a .85. These compare to: Miller et al, (2003; .87), Janse et al, (2014;.82) and Moggia et al (2017; 2018; .88) for the clinical population.…”

Section: Reliabilitysupporting

confidence: 50%

“…Interpersonally (r = -.27, moderate) and the biggest effect size for ORS Overall and K6 Total (r = -.65, strong). These results compared to Miller et al (2003Miller et al ( , 2016, Janse et al (2014) and Moggia et al (2017; [-.17 , .66]). As test-retest correlation coefficient is lower in clinical group compared to higher and significant in the non-clinical group, this suggests that ORS is sensitive to change and reliably assesses the change in a clinical population (FC).…”

Section: Convergent Validity In the Community Sample (Nccs)supporting

confidence: 47%

Validation of the French Versions of Two Brief,Clinician-friendly Outcome Monitoring Tools: The ORS and SRS.

Cazauvieilh¹,

Gana²,

Miller³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

French Validation of two brief Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) scales from the PCOMS system : the ORS (Outcome Rating Scale, Miller et al., 2005) designed to assess various dimensions of well-being and progression during care, and the SRS (Session Rating Scale 3.0; Miller et al., 2002) designed to assess dimensions of the therapeutic relationship. The research implied clinical and non clinical populations and brings estimates regarding factorial structure, validity, reliability, preliminary index and norms of the two scales in French.

show abstract

“…They measure clients' appreciation of the relationship with their therapist, agreement about the goals and issues discussed in the session, agreement with the method or approach, and global assessment of the session. The Spanish version obtained good levels of validity and reliability [46]. This measure will be used each session, and its association with treatment outcome and modality will be analysed.…”

Section: Secondary Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Virtual Reality Increase the Efficacy of Psychotherapy for Young Adults With Mild-to-Moderate Depression? A Study Protocol for A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Montesano

Medina

Paz

et al. 2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The improvement of psychological treatments for depression in young adults is a pressing issue highlighted in the literature. Its relevance is determined not only because young adults are underrepresented in research, but also to prevent chronic severe mental health disorders later in life. Engagement is considered a key factor for a good therapeutic outcome, especially among young patients. In this sense, virtual reality could be particularly suited to engage young adults in the therapy process. This project aims to improve the psychological treatment of mild to moderate depression in young adults by testing out the efficacy of virtual reality-enhanced personal construct therapy (PCT-VR), as compared to personal construct therapy alone (PCT) and to the reference standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). In contrast to CBT, PCT neither educates patients about depression nor gives them directions on the changes to be made in their dysfunctional behaviors or cognitions. Rather, PCT explores the coherence (or conflicts) of thoughts and behaviors with respect to the person’s sense of identity and focuses on meaning-making processes.Methods: The efficacy of this innovative intervention (PCT-VR) will be compared to PCT and to CBT in a randomized clinical trial. The study includes an appraisal of therapists’ adherence and independent assessments to preserve internal validity. The Beck Depression Inventory-II is the primary outcome measure for calculating both statistical and clinical significance, but other outcomes will also be assessed (e.g., functioning, wellbeing, anxiety, stress) at pre-, post-therapy, and six-month follow up. The trial will be conducted in a naturalistic context, mostly at the usual primary health care center of each patient. A sample of 225 participants is targeted to reach enough statistical power to accomplish the goals of the study.Discussion: We expect that providing evidence for PCT-VR will widen the repertoire of evidence-based technology-based psychotherapeutic interventions for young adults and contribute to the prevention of deteriorating courses of the disorder.Trial registration: NCT04321525 [ClinicalTrials.gov] [registered before start of inclusion; 18 February 2020].

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Session Rating Scale 3.0 in a Spanish clinical sample

Cited by 10 publications

References 30 publications

Spanish Versions of the Outcome Rating Scale and the Session Rating Scale: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity

Spanish Versions of the Outcome Rating Scale and the Session Rating Scale: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity

Validation of the French Versions of Two Brief,Clinician-friendly Outcome Monitoring Tools: The ORS and SRS.

Does Virtual Reality Increase the Efficacy of Psychotherapy for Young Adults With Mild-to-Moderate Depression? A Study Protocol for A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About