Psychometric Properties of the SAS, BAI, and S-AI in Chinese University Students

Abstract

Three widely-used self-report anxiety scales, including the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the State Anxiety Inventory (S-AI), were used to simultaneously compare the psychometric properties via an item response theory (IRT) model with Chinese university students as the sample. Although these scales were probably to measure the same underlying construct, namely, anxiety, their psychometric properties were different. Results showed that the BAI’s measurement error was fewer than that of the other scales, with their anxiety severity ranging approximately from the 0.8 standard deviations below the mean to 3 standard deviations above the mean, while the S-AI’s measurement error was fewer than that of the other degrees of anxiety. The S-AI provided more information than the other scales when the student’s scale was less than approximately 0.8 standard deviations below the mean of anxiety severity. In general, the BAI showed better, for it provided more information than the other scales at the broadest range of anxiety severity. The SAS provided less information than the other scales at all anxiety severity range. In conclusion, BAI shows good psychometric quality. Finally, the three instruments were combined on a common scale by using IRT model and a conversion table was provided so as to achieve the transformation of each scale score.

Is the psychological impact of exposure to COVID-19 stronger in adolescents with pre-pandemic maltreatment experiences? A survey of rural Chinese adolescents

“…Although developed in 1971, the SAS continues to be extensively used in research. The SAS has satisfactory psychometric properties, and has been widely used with Chinese populations ( Pang, Tu, & Cai, 2019 ; Zhou, Xu, Inglés, Hidalgo, & La Greca, 2008 ). Cronbach’s alpha for the SAS in this study was 0.83.…”

Factors associated with the general well‐being of nurses in a tertiary Chinese hospital: A cross‐sectional study

“…The final scores are categorized as follows: normal (<45), mild‐to‐moderate anxiety (45–59), marked to severe anxiety (60–74) and extreme anxiety (75–80). The Chinese version of the SAS has a Cronbach alpha of 0.78 and a split‐half reliability of 0.75 (Pang, Tu, & Cai, ).…”

Can Flow Alleviate Anxiety? The Roles of Academic Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem in Building Psychological Sustainability and Resilience

“…A survey conducted by the Anxiety and Depression Association of America reported that seven out of ten American adults claim to experience stress or anxiety at least at a moderate level on a daily basis [1]. As a prevalent emotional disorder that interferes with psychosocial functioning [2], anxiety has also become a serious public health problem in China and among university students, having an impact on their daily life [3]. The gap between economic growth in China and anxiety reminds us to seek clues from other areas besides economics to answer questions in relation to what constitutes a good life.…”