2014
DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2013.852924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Compassionate Love for Close Others and Humanity Scale among Older People

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants responded on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree,7 = strongly agree). Compassion (in a general sense, including towards patients) was measured with a five-item version [35] of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale [36]. Participants responded on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true of me, 7 = very true of me).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants responded on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree,7 = strongly agree). Compassion (in a general sense, including towards patients) was measured with a five-item version [35] of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale [36]. Participants responded on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true of me, 7 = very true of me).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She posits that, although these types of love can co-occur in romantic relationships, they are distinct from each other. Considerable research has been directed at understanding passionate love, companionate love, and attachment love, however, CL is still poorly understood (e.g., Berscheid, 2010 ; Fehr & Sprecher, 2009 ; Neto & Menezes, 2014 ; Oman, 2011 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The itemtotal correlation values (>0.500) indicated that each item relates to the total values of the measured scale. Thus, the authors proceeded to conduct factor analysis, which is commonly used in similar research in the subject of love styles or attachment (Karantzas, Feeney, & Wilkinson, 2010;Neto & Menezes, 2014;Shahrazad, Hoesni, & Chong, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%