2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-017-9619-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Original and Shortened Version of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory among Chinese Adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
11
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, juveniles with high scores on all three dimensions of the YPI-S (psychopathic-like juveniles) showed more conduct problems and offenses than their non-psychopathic-like counterparts. In line with the original 50-item YPI, these results were found in both the general population and offender samples of both genders [ 1 , 16 , 18 , 27 , 30 , 47 50 , 58 , 62 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, juveniles with high scores on all three dimensions of the YPI-S (psychopathic-like juveniles) showed more conduct problems and offenses than their non-psychopathic-like counterparts. In line with the original 50-item YPI, these results were found in both the general population and offender samples of both genders [ 1 , 16 , 18 , 27 , 30 , 47 50 , 58 , 62 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = does not apply at all to 4 = applies very well. As mentioned in the introduction, the reliability and validity of the YPS-S are promising and seem to be in line with the original 50-item YPI [ 1 , 14 , 16 , 18 , 27 , 30 , 47 50 , 58 , 62 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Still, a bifactor model with a general factor is also viewed as an acceptable alternative framework for psychopathy, and has been recently proposed as effective in a sample of 596 French-speaking community and institutionalized adolescents (Pihet et al, 2014), as well as a sample of 2,874 Dutch adolescent students (Zwaanswijk et al, 2016). Likewise, in Chinese community youth, Wang et al (2017) compared the various factor structures tested in previous literature and found the best fitting bifactor model for the Chinese-language versions of the YPI at the subscale level. According to existing research (Pihet et al, 2014; Pechorro et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2017), the internal consistency using Cronbach’s α of the YPI total and three-factor scores was consistently high to acceptable (between 0.70 and 0.93 in the community sample, and above 0.90 in incarcerated youth sample).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%